102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20483934)
1. Sutures v staples. More methodological concerns.
Ockendon M; Gregory J; Cribb G; Cool P
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2630. PubMed ID: 20483934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sutures v staples. What about the NICE guidelines?
Pinkney TD; Pandey S; Radley S; Ismail T
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2631. PubMed ID: 20483935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sutures v staples. More research needed.
Dickson MJ
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2625. PubMed ID: 20483931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sutures v staples. Some troubles with staples.
Kirby R
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2633. PubMed ID: 20483936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sutures v staples. Let's add three other studies.
Vochteloo AJ; Pijls BG; van der Heide HJ
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2627. PubMed ID: 20483932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sutures versus staples. Conclusions are uncertain.
Ball TA
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2628. PubMed ID: 20483933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Wound closure and wound monitoring in total hip arthroplasty. An overview.
Mondini A; Bianchi L; Zagra L
Hip Int; 2012; 22 Suppl 8():S15-8. PubMed ID: 22983895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis: staples versus sutures for surgical procedures.
Hemming K; Pinkney T; Futaba K; Pennant M; Morton DG; Lilford RJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e75132. PubMed ID: 24116028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of stitch length on wound complications.
Harlaar JJ; van Ramshorst GH; Jeekel H; Lange JF
Arch Surg; 2010 Jun; 145(6):599; author reply 599-600. PubMed ID: 20566985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of stitch length on complications.
Hardin M; Oh JS; White CE; Cohn SM
Arch Surg; 2010 Jun; 145(6):600; author reply 600-1. PubMed ID: 20566986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural fiber reinforced biodegradable staples: Novel approach for efficient wound closure.
Lalhmangaihzuali PC; Latha BD; More N; Choppadandi M; Kapusetti G
Med Hypotheses; 2019 May; 126():60-65. PubMed ID: 31010501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of magnetic resonance imaging on surgical staples: an experimental analysis.
Gayton JC; Sensiba P; Imbrogno BF; Venkatarayappa I; Tsatalis J; Prayson MJ
J Trauma; 2011 May; 70(5):1279-81. PubMed ID: 20664378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sutures v staples. BMJ's suturing technique.
Burke M
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2634. PubMed ID: 20483937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intestinal anastomoses.
Genzini T; D'Albuquerque LA; de Miranda MP; Scafuri AG; de Oliveira e Silva A
Rev Paul Med; 1992; 110(4):183-92. PubMed ID: 1341010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sutures versus staples for the management of surgical wounds: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Iavazzo C; Gkegkes ID; Vouloumanou EK; Mamais I; Peppas G; Falagas ME
Am Surg; 2011 Sep; 77(9):1206-21. PubMed ID: 21944632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis of stapling versus suturing for skin closure.
Orlinsky M; Goldberg RM; Chan L; Puertos A; Slajer HL
Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 13(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 7832962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staples for skin closure in surgery.
Singh BI; McGarvey C
BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c403. PubMed ID: 20234048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical analysis on 32 cases with incisional infection of limb wound].
Wang SZ; Li ZH
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 May; 22(5):401-2. PubMed ID: 19522417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 'To bead or not to bead?'.
Thomas RD; Cunningham SC; Thomas MH; Donaldson DR
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1995 Aug; 40(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 7674205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
