BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20484164)

  • 21. Assessment of public doses due to a neutron calibration bunker.
    Suman H; Kharita MH; Yousef S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 19946121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam.
    Budanec M; Knezević Z; Bokulić T; Mrcela I; Vrtar M; Vekić B; Kusić Z
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 18541436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dose distributions of X-rays in water: measurement with TL-dosimeters and comparison with Monte-Carlo calculations.
    Servomaa A; Tapiovaara M
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Aug; 4(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 6468421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monte Carlo simulation of in vivo measurements of 90Sr + 90Y bremsstrahlung.
    Uehara S; Endo S; Takada J; Hoshi M
    Health Phys; 1998 Jan; 74(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 9415579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of an ICCD-scintillator system for measurement of spatial dose distributions around 'hot particles'.
    Aydarous ASh; Darley PJ; Charles MW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 15103061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Skin dose calculations for uranium fuel particles below 500 microns in diameter.
    Pöllänen R; Toivonen H
    Health Phys; 1995 Mar; 68(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 7860313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Calculations of anisotropy factors for radionuclide neutron sources due to scattering from source encapsulation and support structures.
    Tsujimura N; Yoshida T; Momose T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):168-73. PubMed ID: 17575299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Calculation of Coincidence Summing Correction Factors for an HPGe detector using GEANT4.
    Giubrone G; Ortiz J; Gallardo S; Martorell S; Bas MC
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jul; 158-159():114-8. PubMed ID: 27085040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. MCNPX alpha particle dose estimate to the skin tissue from a low-enriched uranium fuel fragment.
    Atanackovic J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 22003183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Skin dose from radionuclide contamination on clothing.
    Taylor DC; Hussein EM; Yuen PS
    Health Phys; 1997 Jun; 72(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 9169925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simulation of the dose rate per activity of beta-emitting radionuclides.
    Behrens R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):653-63. PubMed ID: 25536963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A NEW DOSE DETERMINATION METHOD FOR HP(3) AND DP LENS FOR BETA REFERENCE RADIATION QUALITIES.
    Teng Z; Song M; Liu S; Ni N; Wei K; Liu Y; Hang Z; Geng X; Hu K; Li Q; Jia M; Li D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 May; 199(7):615-622. PubMed ID: 36929013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Calculated beta-ray dose factors for trabecular bone.
    Whitwell JR; Spiers FW
    Phys Med Biol; 1976 Jan; 21(1):16-38. PubMed ID: 1257296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A COMPARISON OF BETA SKIN DOSES CALCULATED WITH VARSKIN 5.35.3 AND MCNP5.
    Dubeau J; Hakmana Witharana SS; Sun J; Heinmiller BE; Chase WJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 30053277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of skin absorbed doses during manipulation of radioactive sources: a comparison between the VARSKIN code and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Amato E; Italiano A
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):262-272. PubMed ID: 29235449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel method for the preparation of large-area 90Sr/90Y sources for the calibration of hand contamination monitors.
    Kumar M; Gandhi SS; Chakravarty R; Nuwad J; Udhayakumar J; Dash A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Sep; 79():5-11. PubMed ID: 23714116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of in-situ measurement for 90 Sr specific activity by β-ray survey meter combined with sensitivity correction by Monte Carlo calculation.
    Tanaka K; Takada J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2011 May; 69(5):814-7. PubMed ID: 21310623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proficiency test of ⁹⁰Y and ⁸⁹Sr activity measurements in Polish hospitals.
    Dziel T; Listkowska A; Tymiński Z
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 May; 87():24-6. PubMed ID: 24315284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Further discussion on the conversion of beta-ray dose rates measured in air to dose rates in skin.
    Burns JE
    Phys Med Biol; 1977 Jan; 22(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 840893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monte Carlo-based calculation of imaging plate response to (90)Sr in teeth: experimental validation of the required correction on sample thickness.
    Tanaka K; Endo S; Toyoda S; Tieliewuhan E; Romanyukha A; Hoshi M
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2007 Aug; 46(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 17429672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.