These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20484420)
1. Nonlaxative PET/CT colonography: feasibility, acceptability, and pilot performance in patients at higher risk of colonic neoplasia. Taylor SA; Bomanji JB; Manpanzure L; Robinson C; Groves AM; Dickson J; Papathanasiou ND; Greenhalgh R; Ell PJ; Halligan S J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 20484420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population. Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined CT colonography and 18F-FDG PET of colon polyps: potential technique for selective detection of cancer and precancerous lesions. Gollub MJ; Akhurst T; Markowitz AJ; Weiser MR; Guillem JG; Smith LM; Larson SM; Margulis AR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):130-8. PubMed ID: 17179355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial. Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance. Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation. Zalis ME; Blake MA; Cai W; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Kazam IG; Keroack M; Magee C; Näppi JJ; Perez-Johnston R; Saltzman JR; Vij A; Yee J; Yoshida H Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(10):692-702. PubMed ID: 22586008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noncathartic CT colonography to screen for colorectal neoplasia in subjects with a family history of colorectal cancer. Fini L; Laghi L; Hassan C; Pestalozza A; Pagano N; Balzarini L; Repici A; Pickhardt PJ; Malesci A Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 24475809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer. Veit P; Kühle C; Beyer T; Kuehl H; Herborn CU; Börsch G; Stergar H; Barkhausen J; Bockisch A; Antoch G Gut; 2006 Jan; 55(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 15970580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Naik S; Lui YW; Milano A; Rajapaksa R; Megibow AJ; Babb J Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 14739311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Rosman AS; Korsten MA Am J Med; 2007 Mar; 120(3):203-210.e4. PubMed ID: 17349438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population. Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography using a Hessian matrix-based algorithm: preliminary study. Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JG; Kim JH; Lefere PA; Han JK; Choi BI AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17579150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Baker ME; Bogoni L; Obuchowski NA; Dass C; Kendzierski RM; Remer EM; Einstein DM; Cathier P; Jerebko A; Lakare S; Blum A; Caroline DF; Macari M Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 17885187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]