These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20484529)

  • 1. Correcting the bias of spike field coherence estimators due to a finite number of spikes.
    Grasse DW; Moxon KA
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 104(1):548-58. PubMed ID: 20484529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First-spike latency in the presence of spontaneous activity.
    Pawlas Z; Klebanov LB; Benes V; Prokesová M; Popelár J; Lánský P
    Neural Comput; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1675-97. PubMed ID: 20235823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wavelet-based processing of neuronal spike trains prior to discriminant analysis.
    Laubach M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Apr; 134(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 15003382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous recording of the field-EPSP as well as the population spike in the CA1 region in freely moving rats by using a fixed "double"-recording electrode.
    Scherf T; Frey JU; Frey S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Apr; 188(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 20105443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing neuronal coherence with single-unit, multi-unit, and local field potentials.
    Zeitler M; Fries P; Gielen S
    Neural Comput; 2006 Sep; 18(9):2256-81. PubMed ID: 16846392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic sorting for multi-neuronal activity recorded with tetrodes in the presence of overlapping spikes.
    Takahashi S; Anzai Y; Sakurai Y
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Apr; 89(4):2245-58. PubMed ID: 12612049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential Monte Carlo point-process estimation of kinematics from neural spiking activity for brain-machine interfaces.
    Wang Y; Paiva AR; Príncipe JC; Sanchez JC
    Neural Comput; 2009 Oct; 21(10):2894-930. PubMed ID: 19548797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An algorithm for real-time extraction of population EPSP and population spike amplitudes from hippocampal field potential recordings.
    Gholmieh G; Courellis S; Dimoka A; Wills JD; LaCoss J; Granacki JJ; Marmarelis V; Berger T
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Jul; 136(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 15183263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inferring spike trains from local field potentials.
    Rasch MJ; Gretton A; Murayama Y; Maass W; Logothetis NK
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):1461-76. PubMed ID: 18160425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From spike to graph--a complete automated single-spike analysis.
    Friedrich R; Ashery U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Nov; 193(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 20869399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimensionality reduction in neural models: an information-theoretic generalization of spike-triggered average and covariance analysis.
    Pillow JW; Simoncelli EP
    J Vis; 2006 Apr; 6(4):414-28. PubMed ID: 16889478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimising coherence estimation to assess the functional correlation of tremor-related activity between the subthalamic nucleus and the forearm muscles.
    Wang SY; Liu X; Yianni J; Christopher Miall R; Aziz TZ; Stein JF
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Jul; 136(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 15183272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tight data-robust bounds to mutual information combining shuffling and model selection techniques.
    Montemurro MA; Senatore R; Panzeri S
    Neural Comput; 2007 Nov; 19(11):2913-57. PubMed ID: 17883346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.
    Marques TA
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dependence of neuronal correlations on filter characteristics and marginal spike train statistics.
    Tetzlaff T; Rotter S; Stark E; Abeles M; Aertsen A; Diesmann M
    Neural Comput; 2008 Sep; 20(9):2133-84. PubMed ID: 18439140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate spike sorting for multi-unit recordings.
    Takekawa T; Isomura Y; Fukai T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 31(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 20074217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic sorting of multiple unit neuronal signals in the presence of anisotropic and non-Gaussian variability.
    Fee MS; Mitra PP; Kleinfeld D
    J Neurosci Methods; 1996 Nov; 69(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 8946321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An improved method for the estimation of firing rate dynamics using an optimal digital filter.
    Cherif S; Cullen KE; Galiana HL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Aug; 173(1):165-81. PubMed ID: 18577401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rate-adjusted spike-LFP coherence comparisons from spike-train statistics.
    Aoi MC; Lepage KQ; Kramer MA; Eden UT
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():141-53. PubMed ID: 25460189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining Burst Firing Time Distributions from Multiple Spike Trains.
    Lago-Fernández LF; Szücs A; Varona P
    Neural Comput; 2009 Apr; 21(4):973-90. PubMed ID: 19199390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.