These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20484530)

  • 1. Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension.
    Howard MF; Poeppel D
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 104(5):2500-11. PubMed ID: 20484530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension.
    Peelle JE; Gross J; Davis MH
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1378-87. PubMed ID: 22610394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.
    Luo H; Poeppel D
    Neuron; 2007 Jun; 54(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 17582338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. θ-Band and β-Band Neural Activity Reflects Independent Syllable Tracking and Comprehension of Time-Compressed Speech.
    Pefkou M; Arnal LH; Fontolan L; Giraud AL
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(33):7930-7938. PubMed ID: 28729443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the theta band but not in the delta band modulates the comprehension of naturalistic speech in noise.
    Keshavarzi M; Kegler M; Kadir S; Reichenbach T
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116557. PubMed ID: 31968233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcranial alternating current stimulation with speech envelopes modulates speech comprehension.
    Wilsch A; Neuling T; Obleser J; Herrmann CS
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():766-774. PubMed ID: 29355765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Previous exposure to intact speech increases intelligibility of its digitally degraded counterpart as a function of stimulus complexity.
    Hakonen M; May PJC; Alho J; Alku P; Jokinen E; Jääskeläinen IP; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():131-143. PubMed ID: 26477651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Speech Tracking in the Theta and in the Delta Frequency Band Differentially Encode Clarity and Comprehension of Speech in Noise.
    Etard O; Reichenbach T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5750-5759. PubMed ID: 31109963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural source dynamics of brain responses to continuous stimuli: Speech processing from acoustics to comprehension.
    Brodbeck C; Presacco A; Simon JZ
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():162-174. PubMed ID: 29366698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.
    Kaufeld G; Bosker HR; Ten Oever S; Alday PM; Meyer AS; Martin AE
    J Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 40(49):9467-9475. PubMed ID: 33097640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing.
    Doelling KB; Arnal LH; Ghitza O; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 85 Pt 2(0 2):761-8. PubMed ID: 23791839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical competition in nonnative speech comprehension.
    FitzPatrick I; Indefrey P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1165-78. PubMed ID: 19583470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural tracking of speech envelope does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility.
    Kösem A; Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 272():120040. PubMed ID: 36935084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information.
    Cogan GB; Poeppel D
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 106(2):554-63. PubMed ID: 21562190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical auditory responses index the contributions of different RMS-level-dependent segments to speech intelligibility.
    Wang L; Li H; Wu EX; Chen F
    Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107808. PubMed ID: 31606583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical representation explains cortical entrainment during speech comprehension.
    Frank SL; Yang J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197304. PubMed ID: 29771964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scale-Free Amplitude Modulation of Neuronal Oscillations Tracks Comprehension of Accelerated Speech.
    Borges AFT; Giraud AL; Mansvelder HD; Linkenkaer-Hansen K
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 38(3):710-722. PubMed ID: 29217685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.
    Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BE; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P; Kei J; Sockalingam R; Chenery HJ
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15179119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple brain signatures of integration in the comprehension of degraded speech.
    Obleser J; Kotz SA
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(2):713-23. PubMed ID: 21172443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive processing increases intelligibility of acoustically distorted speech: Behavioral and neural correlates.
    Hakonen M; May PJC; Jääskeläinen IP; Jokinen E; Sams M; Tiitinen H
    Brain Behav; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e00789. PubMed ID: 28948083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.