BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20484778)

  • 1. Implementation of water calorimetry in a 180 MeV scanned pulsed proton beam including an experimental determination of kQ for a Farmer chamber.
    Medin J
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3287-98. PubMed ID: 20484778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
    Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absorbed dose to water determination with ionization chamber dosimetry and calorimetry in restricted neutron, photon, proton and heavy-ion radiation fields.
    Brede HJ; Greif KD; Hecker O; Heeg P; Heese J; Jones DT; Kluge H; Schardt D
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3667-82. PubMed ID: 16861773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental determination of
    Medin J; Andreo P; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35081517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LET dependence of GafChromic films and an ion chamber in low-energy proton dosimetry.
    Kirby D; Green S; Palmans H; Hugtenburg R; Wojnecki C; Parker D
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):417-33. PubMed ID: 20019399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chamber-quality factors in 60Co for three plane-parallel chambers for the dosimetry of electrons, protons and heavier charged particles: PENELOPE Monte Carlo simulations.
    Panettieri V; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5917-26. PubMed ID: 18836218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct determination of k
    Osinga-Blättermann JM; Brons S; Greilich S; Jäkel O; Krauss A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2033-2054. PubMed ID: 28212111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
    Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
    González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams.
    Vilches-Freixas G; Bosmans G; Douralis A; Martens J; Meijers A; Rinaldi I; Salvo K; Thomas R; Palmans H; Lourenço A
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(10):. PubMed ID: 38640918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
    Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the p(dis) correction factor for cylindrical chambers.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):L9-16; author reply L17-9. PubMed ID: 20157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
    Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calorimetric determination of kQ factors for NE 2561 and NE 2571 ionization chambers in 5 cm x 5 cm and 10 cm x 10 cm radiotherapy beams of 8 MV and 16 MV photons.
    Krauss A; Kapsch RP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6243-59. PubMed ID: 17921583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference dosimetry in a scanned pulsed proton beam using ionisation chambers and a Faraday cup.
    Lorin S; Grusell E; Tilly N; Medin J; Kimstrand P; Glimelius B
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3519-29. PubMed ID: 18552418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetry of clinical neutron and proton beams: an overview of recommendations.
    Vynckier S; ;
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):565-72. PubMed ID: 15353710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct absorbed dose to water determination based on water calorimetry in scanning proton beam delivery.
    Sarfehnia A; Clasie B; Chung E; Lu HM; Flanz J; Cascio E; Engelsman M; Paganetti H; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3541-50. PubMed ID: 20831061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comment on 'Proton beam monitor chamber calibration'.
    Palmans H; Vatnitsky SM
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6585-93. PubMed ID: 27535790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.