295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20485030)
1. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Sertgöz A
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of passive fit absence in the prosthesis/implant/retaining screw system: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 20(6):2000-5. PubMed ID: 19881380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis.
Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; Dos Santos MB
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Sep; 71(5):1243-9. PubMed ID: 23320569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of stress distribution in overdenture-retaining bar with different levels of vertical misfit.
Spazzin AO; Abreu RT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 21658152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of horizontal misfit and bar framework material on the stress distribution of an overdenture-retaining bar system: a 3D finite element analysis.
Spazzin AO; Dos Santos MB; Sobrinho LC; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 21973281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis.
Rubo JH; Capello Souza EA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 19220846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
