These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20485031)

  • 1. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Nov; 92(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 18783845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution.
    Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 19076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
    Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
    Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
    Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis and comparison of stress distribution in overdentures supported with bar attachments and telescopic crowns.
    Pan S; Yin Y; Feng H
    Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10557179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
    Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Adelino Ricardo Barão V; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 20098182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of implant-supported prosthesis and its supporting tissue in the edentulous mandible. Part 6. The influence of superstructure in mandibular complete implant overdenture and its supporting tissue].
    He J; Cen Y; Mao X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Feb; 15(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 11480066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.