203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20485031)
1. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Nov; 92(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 18783845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution.
Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 19076244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis and comparison of stress distribution in overdentures supported with bar attachments and telescopic crowns.
Pan S; Yin Y; Feng H
Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10557179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Adelino Ricardo Barão V; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 20098182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of implant-supported prosthesis and its supporting tissue in the edentulous mandible. Part 6. The influence of superstructure in mandibular complete implant overdenture and its supporting tissue].
He J; Cen Y; Mao X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Feb; 15(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 11480066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
