159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20485037)
1. Evaluation of different retention systems on a distal extension removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant.
Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Goiato MC; Gennari Filho H
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 20485037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of bone insertion level of support teeth in class I mandibular removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant: a study using finite element analysis.
Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Pereira JA; Zuim PR; Santiago Júnior JF
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 21613946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of ridge inclination and implant localization on the association of mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial denture.
Cunha LD; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Goiato MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):871-5. PubMed ID: 21558932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of implant inclination associated with mandibular class I removable partial denture.
de Freitas Santos CM; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; de Moraes SL; Falcón-Antenucci RM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):663-8. PubMed ID: 21415633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the influence of location of osseointegrated implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures.
Cunha LD; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Pereira JA
Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 18784528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of length and diameter of implants associated with distal extension removable partial dentures.
Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Rocha EP; Pereira JA
Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 17846543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of rigid and nonrigid extracoronal attachments on supporting tissues in extension base partial removable dental prostheses: a nonlinear finite element study.
Wang HY; Zhang YM; Yao D; Chen JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 May; 105(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 21530760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
Lin CL; Wang JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element method analysis of the stress distribution to supporting tissues in a Class IV Aramany removable partial denture (Part I: the teeth and periodontal ligament).
Gharechahi J; Sharifi E; Aghdaee NA; Nosohian S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):65-72. PubMed ID: 18784861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element contact stress analysis of the RPD abutment tooth and periodontal ligament.
Muraki H; Wakabayashi N; Park I; Ohyama T
J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):659-65. PubMed ID: 15476961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment.
Ohkubo C; Kobayashi M; Suzuki Y; Hosoi T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19216279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of a posterior implant support for extra shortened dental arches: a biomechanical model analysis.
Maeda Y; Sogo M; Tsutsumi S
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):656-60. PubMed ID: 16102078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element method analysis of stress distribution to supporting tissues in a Class IV Aramany removable partial denture (Part II: bone and mucosal membrane).
Gharechahi J; Sharifi E; Nosohian S; Aghdaee NA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):49-56. PubMed ID: 18997916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
