121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2048512)
1. Radiologic evaluation of the normal and diseased posterior cervical space.
Parker GD; Harnsberger HR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):161-5. PubMed ID: 2048512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis.
Som PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 May; 158(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 1566697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Imaging of cervical masses].
Sigal R
J Radiol; 1999 Dec; 80(12 Suppl):1807-15. PubMed ID: 11013705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential diagnosis of head and neck lesions based on their space of origin. 2. The infrahyoid portion of the neck.
Smoker WR; Harnsberger HR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 2048511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retropharyngeal space: evaluation of normal anatomy and diseases with CT and MR imaging.
Davis WL; Harnsberger HR; Smoker WR; Watanabe AS
Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 2294573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown head and neck primary site.
Cianchetti M; Mancuso AA; Amdur RJ; Werning JW; Kirwan J; Morris CG; Mendenhall WM
Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2348-54. PubMed ID: 19718744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Sumi M; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 11264102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT and MRI of the normal and diseased perivertebral space.
Davis WL; Harnsberger HR
Neuroradiology; 1995 Jul; 37(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 7477840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in head-neck tumors. Methods, chief criteria, differential diagnosis and clinical results].
Lenz M
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr Erganzungsbd; 1992; 130():1-199. PubMed ID: 1339587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Regional lymph node metastases in malignant tumors of the head and neck: value of diagnostic procedures].
Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Jan; 70(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 2025343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Rodrigues RS; Bozza FA; Christian PE; Hoffman JM; Butterfield RI; Christensen CR; Heilbrun M; Wiggins RH; Hunt JP; Bentz BG; Hitchcock YJ; Morton KA
J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1205-13. PubMed ID: 19617339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of gadolinium-DTPA in the evaluation of extracranial head and neck mass lesions.
Crawford SC; Harnsberger HR; Lufkin RB; Hanafee WN
Radiol Clin North Am; 1989 Mar; 27(2):219-42. PubMed ID: 2919230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Magnetic resonance tomography in tumors of the facial bones and neck area].
Lindemann J; Steinbrich W; Mödder U; Rose KG
HNO; 1986 Jun; 34(6):241-7. PubMed ID: 3744909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distant metastases in head and neck carcinoma: identification of prognostic groups with MR imaging.
Ljumanovic R; Langendijk JA; Hoekstra OS; Leemans CR; Castelijns JA
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Oct; 60(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 16829010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to the neck from an unknown head and neck primary site.
Mendenhall WM; Mancuso AA; Amdur RJ; Stringer SP; Villaret DB; Cassisi NJ
Am J Otolaryngol; 2001; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 11464323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes.
Holzapfel K; Duetsch S; Fauser C; Eiber M; Rummeny EJ; Gaa J
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 18995981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma presenting as a neck lump.
Millwaters M; Khan N; Halfpenny W
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 46(2):144-5. PubMed ID: 17321646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
