173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20488142)
1. Comparative study of intraoperative knee flexion with three different TKR designs.
Wajsfisz A; Biau D; Boisrenoult P; Beaufils P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 May; 96(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 20488142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fixation of high-flexion total knee prostheses: five-year follow-up results of a four-arm randomized controlled clinical and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis study.
Nieuwenhuijse MJ; van der Voort P; Kaptein BL; van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Oct; 95(19):e1411-11. PubMed ID: 24088976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No difference in range of motion between ultracongruent and posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Lützner J; Beyer F; Dexel J; Fritzsche H; Lützner C; Kirschner S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3515-3521. PubMed ID: 27659044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Different intraoperative kinematics with comparable clinical outcomes of ultracongruent and posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Kim TW; Lee SM; Seong SC; Lee S; Jang J; Lee MC
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Sep; 24(9):3036-3043. PubMed ID: 25567541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hi-flexion and gender-specific designs fail to provide significant increases in range of motion during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Song EK; Park SJ; Yoon TR; Park KS; Seo HY; Seon JK
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1081-4. PubMed ID: 22115763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Different intraoperative kinematics, stability, and range of motion between cruciate-substituting ultracongruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
Fritzsche H; Beyer F; Postler A; Lützner J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1465-1470. PubMed ID: 28093635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
Vogt JC; Saarbach C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study.
Kim YH; Choi Y; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(10):1911-20. PubMed ID: 20720134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do we need a gender-specific total knee replacement? A randomised controlled trial comparing a high-flex and a gender-specific posterior design.
Thomsen MG; Husted H; Bencke J; Curtis D; Holm G; Troelsen A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 22628593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting the achievement of Japanese-style deep knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior-stabilized prosthesis with high-flex knee design.
Niki Y; Takeda Y; Harato K; Suda Y
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Nov; 20(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 26275557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a mobile-bearing, high-flexion design increase knee flexion after total knee replacement?
Nutton RW; Wade FA; Coutts FJ; van der Linden ML
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1051-7. PubMed ID: 22844045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-flexion vs conventional prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Luo SX; Su W; Zhao JM; Sha K; Wei QJ; Li XF
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 21074357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early results with the Genesis II Posterior Stabilized High Flexion knee prosthesis. A one year follow-up study.
Zeh A; Davis J; Laskin R; Klima S; Wohlrab D
Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Dec; 75(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 20166362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Joint gap kinematics in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty measured by a new tensor with the navigation system.
Matsumoto T; Muratsu H; Tsumura N; Mizuno K; Kuroda R; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Dec; 128(6):867-71. PubMed ID: 17154688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee bending motion.
Tamaki M; Tomita T; Watanabe T; Yamazaki T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):972-8. PubMed ID: 19033084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is patient self-assessment of flexion after TKR able to identify risk of manipulation under anaesthesia?
Maclean C; Deakin AH; Picard F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 98(6):672-6. PubMed ID: 22939105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of preoperative deformity on intraoperative soft tissue balance in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
Matsumoto T; Muratsu H; Kubo S; Matsushita T; Kurosaka M; Kuroda R
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1291-8. PubMed ID: 21353452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Favorable outcomes of posterior cruciate-stabilized inserts over ultracongruent inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
Obana KK; Wong K; Shimoda BT; Rimm J; Stickley CD; Nakasone CK
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Sep; 143(9):5857-5865. PubMed ID: 36928502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability.
Bae JH; Yoon JR; Sung JH; Shin YS
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Nov; 26(11):3300-3310. PubMed ID: 29459998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
