425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20488773)
1. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture.
Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2010 May; 12(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20346725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic groups under the NRC-II Recommendation 4.1.
Fung WK; Hu YQ
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3583-93. PubMed ID: 12436457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures.
Paoletti DR; Doom TE; Krane CM; Raymer ML; Krane DE
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 16382829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpreting DNA mixtures with the presence of relatives.
Hu YQ; Fung WK
Int J Legal Med; 2003 Feb; 117(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 12592594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.
Perlin MW; Legler MM; Spencer CE; Smith JL; Allan WP; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1430-47. PubMed ID: 21827458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forensic interpretation of Y-chromosomal DNA mixtures.
Wolf A; Caliebe A; Junge O; Krawczak M
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15978347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting forensic DNA profiling evidence without specifying the number of contributors.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():269-80. PubMed ID: 25261845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
Taroni F; Aitken CG
Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpreting DNA mixtures.
Weir BS; Triggs CM; Starling L; Stowell LI; Walsh KA; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 9068179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
