426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20488773)
21. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Identifying contributors of DNA mixtures by means of quantitative information of STR typing.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
J Comput Biol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):887-902. PubMed ID: 21210742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Setting bounds for the likelihood ratio when multiple hypotheses are postulated.
Buckleton JS; Evett IW; Weir BS
Sci Justice; 1998; 38(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9624810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Forensic identification of an individual in complex DNA mixtures.
Voskoboinik L; Darvasi A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 20888313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validating TrueAllele
Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value.
Bär W
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2003 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S41-4. PubMed ID: 12935550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of varying the number of contributors on likelihood ratios for complex DNA mixtures.
Benschop CCG; Haned H; Jeurissen L; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():92-99. PubMed ID: 26204570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Commentary on: Budowle B, Onorato AJ, Callaghan TF, Della Manna A, Gross AM, Guerrieri RA, Luttman JC, McClure DL. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):810-21.
Gill P; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):265-8; author reply 269-72. PubMed ID: 20412159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Penalized likelihood phylogenetic inference: bridging the parsimony-likelihood gap.
Kim J; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 18853355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations.
Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton J; Weir BS
J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):987-95. PubMed ID: 10486951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estimation of the number of contributors of theoretical mixture profiles based on allele counting: Does increasing the number of loci increase success rate of estimates?
Dembinski GM; Sobieralski C; Picard CJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():24-32. PubMed ID: 29175725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
