These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20489096)
1. Malpractice issues in radiology: medicare compliance versus standard of care conformance--real or imaginary conflict? Duszak R; Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1552-8. PubMed ID: 20489096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A glimpse over the horizon: choosing our future. Porter-O'Grady T Orthop Nurs; 1998; 17(2 Suppl):53-60. PubMed ID: 9601414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compliance with breast-conservation standards for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. White J; Morrow M; Moughan J; Owen J; Pajak T; DesHarnais S; Winchester DP; Wilson JF; ; Cancer; 2003 Feb; 97(4):893-904. PubMed ID: 12569588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New tools for cost-effective delivery of breast imaging. Kolb GR Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(4):22-6, 28, 30; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 12229054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammography and malpractice. Potchen EJ; Bisesi MA; Sierra AE; Potchen JE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 1741799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast microcalcifications: how to answer women's questions. Connelly Kudzma E Nurs Womens Health; 2008 Feb; 12(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 18257885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial. Kiefe CI; McKay SV; Halevy A; Brody BA Arch Intern Med; 1994 Jun; 154(11):1217-24. PubMed ID: 8203989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lessons learned from reviewing breast imaging malpractice cases. Arleo EK; Saleh M; Rosenblatt R J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1186-8. PubMed ID: 24889476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening can survive malpractice ... if radiologists take center stage and assume the role of educator. Berlin L Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):641-4. PubMed ID: 15564402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical malpractice: a case study in medical and legal decision making. Piccirillo M; Graf GJ Yale J Biol Med; 1989; 62(1):23-42. PubMed ID: 2728499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart. Benedetto AR Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Personalized targeted mailing increases mammography among long-term noncompliant medicare beneficiaries: a randomized trial. Harrison RV; Janz NK; Wolfe RA; Tedeschi PJ; Chernew M; Stross JK; Huang X; McMahon LF Med Care; 2003 Mar; 41(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 12618641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Take time for a mammogram. Bren L FDA Consum; 2005; 39(5):36-7. PubMed ID: 16419291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Malpractice litigation involving patients with carcinoma of the breast. Mitnick JS; Vazquez MF; Kronovet SZ; Roses DF J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Oct; 181(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 7551325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiology case of the month. Incidental discovery on mammography done for a palpable breast mass. Granular cell tumor. Patel SM; Clayton J; Neitzschman H J La State Med Soc; 2000 Aug; 152(8):377-8. PubMed ID: 11011522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When the patient asks for the results of her mammogram, how should the radiologist reply? Hoffman NY; Janus J; Destounis S; Logan-Young W AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):597-9. PubMed ID: 8109504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which women aren't getting mammograms and why? (United States). Meissner HI; Breen N; Taubman ML; Vernon SW; Graubard BI Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Feb; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 17186422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography screening and the self-referred woman. Sickles EA Radiology; 1988 Jan; 166(1 Pt 1):271-3. PubMed ID: 3336693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]