299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20489263)
1. Experimental studies and modeling on concentration polarization in forward osmosis.
Qin JJ; Chen S; Oo MH; Kekre KA; Cornelissen ER; Ruiken CJ
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(11):2897-904. PubMed ID: 20489263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Boric acid permeation in forward osmosis membrane processes: modeling, experiments, and implications.
Jin X; Tang CY; Gu Y; She Q; Qi S
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2323-30. PubMed ID: 21329347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments.
Phillip WA; Yong JS; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5170-6. PubMed ID: 20527762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.
She Q; Jin X; Li Q; Tang CY
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22386887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon.
Lay WC; Chong TH; Tang CY; Fane AG; Zhang J; Liu Y
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 20182071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling.
Wang Y; Wicaksana F; Tang CY; Fane AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(18):7102-9. PubMed ID: 20735033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental study of a 4040 spiral-wound forward-osmosis membrane module.
Kim YC; Park SJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(18):7737-45. PubMed ID: 21842852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forward osmosis desalination using polymer hydrogels as a draw agent: influence of draw agent, feed solution and membrane on process performance.
Li D; Zhang X; Simon GP; Wang H
Water Res; 2013 Jan; 47(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 23103058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scale-up of osmotic membrane bioreactors by modeling salt accumulation and draw solution dilution using hollow-fiber membrane characteristics and operation conditions.
Kim S
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():88-95. PubMed ID: 24746768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process.
Lee J; Kim B; Hong S
J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Jun; 26(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25079847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly.
Saren Q; Qiu CQ; Tang CY
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(12):5201-8. PubMed ID: 21591607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate.
Holloway RW; Childress AE; Dennett KE; Cath TY
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):4005-14. PubMed ID: 17604810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new class of draw solutions for minimizing reverse salt flux to improve forward osmosis desalination.
Nguyen HT; Nguyen NC; Chen SS; Ngo HH; Guo W; Li CW
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 538():129-36. PubMed ID: 26298255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ferric and cobaltous hydroacid complexes for forward osmosis (FO) processes.
Ge Q; Fu F; Chung TS
Water Res; 2014 Jul; 58():230-8. PubMed ID: 24768702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling and simulation of fertilizer drawn forward osmosis process using Aspen Plus-MATLAB model.
Gulied M; Al Nouss A; Khraisheh M; AlMomani F
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jan; 700():134461. PubMed ID: 31629261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fabrication and performance of PET mesh enhanced cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis.
Li G; Wang J; Hou D; Bai Y; Liu H
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Jul; 45():7-17. PubMed ID: 27372114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preliminary study of osmotic membrane bioreactor: effects of draw solution on water flux and air scouring on fouling.
Qin JJ; Kekre KA; Oo MH; Tao G; Lay CL; Lew CH; Cornelissen ER; Ruiken CJ
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 20861550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploration of an innovative draw solution for a forward osmosis-membrane distillation desalination process.
Nguyen NC; Chen SS; Jain S; Nguyen HT; Ray SS; Ngo HH; Guo W; Lam NT; Duong HC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(6):5203-5211. PubMed ID: 28527139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
