BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20491419)

  • 1. A critical review of adolescent problem gambling assessment instruments.
    Stinchfield R
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2010; 22(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 20491419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
    Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
    Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of Instruments Measuring At-Risk and Problem Gambling Among Young Individuals: A Systematic Review Covering Years 2009-2015.
    Edgren R; Castrén S; Mäkelä M; Pörtfors P; Alho H; Salonen AH
    J Adolesc Health; 2016 Jun; 58(6):600-15. PubMed ID: 27151759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties.
    Raylu N; Oei TP
    Addiction; 2004 Jun; 99(6):757-69. PubMed ID: 15139874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
    Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students.
    Weinstock J; Whelan JP; Meyers AW; McCausland C
    Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17986657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: psychometric evaluation.
    Hodgins DC
    Addict Behav; 2004 Nov; 29(8):1685-90. PubMed ID: 15451138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The SOGS-RA vs. the MAGS-7: prevalence estimates and classification congruence.
    Langhinrichsen-Rohling J; Rohling ML; Rohde P; Seeley JR
    J Gambl Stud; 2004; 20(3):259-81. PubMed ID: 15353924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence estimates of gambling participation and problem gambling among 16-18-year-old students in Iceland: a comparison of the SOGS-RA and DSM-IV-MR-J.
    Olason DT; Sigurdardottir KJ; Smari J
    J Gambl Stud; 2006; 22(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 16374661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
    Stinchfield R
    Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevention of problem gambling in Chinese adolescents: relevance of problem gambling assessment and positive youth development frameworks.
    Shek DT; Lee JJ
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2010; 22(1):139-51. PubMed ID: 20491423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a screening tool: IRT-based evidence.
    Chiesi F; Donati MA; Galli S; Primi C
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Mar; 27(1):287-93. PubMed ID: 23025708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary validity and reliability testing of a structured clinical interview for pathological gambling.
    Grant JE; Steinberg MA; Kim SW; Rounsaville BJ; Potenza MN
    Psychiatry Res; 2004 Aug; 128(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 15450917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 3. An assessment of Pathological Gambling criteria.
    Denis C; Fatséas M; Auriacombe M
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2012 Apr; 122(1-2):22-7. PubMed ID: 21962725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.
    Hardoon K; Derevensky JL; Gupta R
    Addict Behav; 2003 Jul; 28(5):933-46. PubMed ID: 12788266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
    Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence and correlates of gambling among 16 to 19-year-old adolescents in Norway.
    Molde H; Pallesen S; Bartone P; Hystad S; Johnsen BH
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Feb; 50(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 18564320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. At-risk and problem gambling among adolescents: a convenience sample of first-year junior high school students in Finland.
    Castrén S; Grainger M; Lahti T; Alho H; Salonen AH
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2015 Mar; 10():9. PubMed ID: 25879923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling: psychometric properties and evidence from cognitive biases.
    Lakey CE; Goodie AS; Lance CE; Stinchfield R; Winters KC
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Dec; 23(4):479-98. PubMed ID: 17453325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.