These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The perfect material. The restorative maturation of resin inlays and onlays. Feigenbaum NL Dent Today; 1992; 11(5):42, 44-7. PubMed ID: 1622593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [A new laboratory composite for bonded inlays and onlays]. Miara P Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1988; 17(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 3075328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Esthetic inlays and onlays. Jackson RD Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1994; ():30-9. PubMed ID: 8032438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A composite resin and gold onlay restoration. Naka CK Gen Dent; 1987; 35(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 3327734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Achieving predictable results with posterior inlays and onlays. Howard NY Dent Today; 1996 May; 15(5):76, 78, 80-1. PubMed ID: 9567875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mastering the art of indirect composite restorations, Part 2. Pitel ML Dent Today; 1996 Mar; 15(3):50, 52, 54-7. PubMed ID: 9567800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin. Schulte AG; Vöckler A; Reinhardt R J Dent; 2005 May; 33(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 15833400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period. Kaytan B; Onal B; Pamir T; Tezel H Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 16252535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The use of modern ceramics for inlays and onlays]. Dumfahrt H; Schäffer H; Manhartsberger C Z Stomatol; 1989 Jun; 86(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 2700408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Copy-milled all-ceramic restorations: case reports. Sevük C; Gür H; Akkayan B Quintessence Int; 2002 May; 33(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 12014164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Bonded single restorations and the concept of pellicular preparations]. Touati B; Pissis P; Miara P Cah Prothese; 1985 Dec; 13(52):95-130. PubMed ID: 3914353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations. Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]