These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20493320)

  • 1. A digital radiographic artifact: A clinical report.
    Schweitzer DM; Berg RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):326-9. PubMed ID: 20493320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 9482015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for a false positive test outcome in diagnosis of caries in approximal surfaces: impact of radiographic modality and observer characteristics.
    Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E
    Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 17426395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guide to Digital Radiographic Imaging.
    Mol A; Yoon DC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):503-11. PubMed ID: 26820007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital imaging for dental caries.
    Wenzel A
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):319-38, vi. PubMed ID: 10740771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of digital image processing artefacts mimicking pathological features associated with restorations.
    Brettle D; Carmichael F
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 21869791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interproximal caries detection: how good are we?
    Dykstra B
    Dent Today; 2008 Apr; 27(4):144, 146-7. PubMed ID: 18497209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimisation of conditions of visualisation of dental crowns in dental radiography.
    Michalska A; Rózyło-Kalinowska I; Jurkiewicz-Mazurek M; Rózyło TK
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 12898912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1397467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of digital radiography of interproximal dental caries.
    Sanden E; Koob A; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 12967070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
    Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
    Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems.
    Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9084283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.