298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20493618)
1. Evaluation of mandibular ramus morphology using computed tomography in patients with mandibular prognathism and retrognathia: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Noleto JW; Marchiori E; Da Silveira HM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1788-94. PubMed ID: 20493618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus in prognathism: effect on the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Muto T; Shigeo K; Yamamoto K; Kawakami J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 61(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 12524614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomical position of the mandibular canal in relation to the buccal cortical bone in Chinese patients with different dentofacial relationships.
Huang CY; Liao YF
J Formos Med Assoc; 2016 Nov; 115(11):981-990. PubMed ID: 26723862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of mandibular rami width in patients with prognathism and retrognathia.
Ribeiro DP; Gandelmann IH; Medeiros PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1506-9. PubMed ID: 16982309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Significance of ramus measurement through computed tomography in the sagittal split osteotomy of the ramus].
Ma J; Li BH; Lu L
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 24(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 19119634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomic study to determine a safe surgical reference point for mandibular ramus osteotomy.
Park KR; Kim SY; Kim GJ; Park HS; Jung YS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23454267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve canal position at mandibular second molar in patients with prognathism and possible occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yoshioka I; Tanaka T; Khanal A; Habu M; Kito S; Kodama M; Oda M; Wakasugi-Sato N; Matsumoto-Takeda S; Fukai Y; Tokitsu T; Tomikawa M; Seta Y; Tominaga K; Morimoto Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 68(12):3022-7. PubMed ID: 20739116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Mukozawa A; Miyazaki M; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 19699116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the mandibular ramus fracture line after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Muto T; Takahashi M; Akizuki K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):e648-52. PubMed ID: 23078827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in the dimensions of milled mandibular models after mandibular sagittal split osteotomies.
Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Jun; 36(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 9678885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-sectional tomography in evaluation of patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy.
Hallikainen D; Iizuka T; Lindqvist C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Dec; 50(12):1269-73. PubMed ID: 1447604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus at the lingual plane in patients with mandibular hyperplasia.
Ma J; Lu L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(8):823-6. PubMed ID: 19395237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Position of mandibular canal and ramus morphology before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Miyazaki M; Mukozawa A; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 20044190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Study of Mandible Ramus Morphology Using 3-dimensional CT in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.
Hirota M; Suga K; Shibahara T
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018 Nov; 59(4):237-245. PubMed ID: 30333371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revisiting the supraforaminal horizontal oblique osteotomy of the mandible.
Kaduk WM; Podmelle F; Louis PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):421-8. PubMed ID: 21684657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Mandibular Anatomy Associated With Bad Splits in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy of Mandible.
Wang T; Han JJ; Oh HK; Park HJ; Jung S; Park YJ; Kook MS
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):e500-4. PubMed ID: 27391522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
