193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20493619)
1. Comparison of transverse dimensional changes in surgical skeletal Class III patients with and without presurgical orthodontics.
Wang YC; Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR; Takano-Yamamoto T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1807-12. PubMed ID: 20493619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transverse implications of maxillary premolar extraction in Class III presurgical orthodontic treatment.
Lee SJ; Kim TW; Nahm DS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):740-8. PubMed ID: 16769492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of minimal versus conventional presurgical orthodontics in skeletal class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery.
Joh B; Bayome M; Park JH; Park JU; Kim Y; Kook YA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1733-41. PubMed ID: 23932114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.
Ko EW; Hsu SS; Hsieh HY; Wang YC; Huang CS; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1469-77. PubMed ID: 21256648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Preliminary study of non-surgical treatment of severe Class III malocclusion in 18 patients of 12-20 years old].
Lin JX; Gu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15061874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Change in maxillary incisor inclination during surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion: comparison of extraction and nonextraction of the maxillary first premolars.
Kim DK; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):324-35. PubMed ID: 23452966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study.
Johnston C; Burden D; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 16979487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Progressive changes in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated by 2-jaw surgery with minimal and conventional presurgical orthodontics: A comparative study.
Zhou Y; Li Z; Wang X; Zou B; Zhou Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26827981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The long-term stability of dentition in skeletal class III malocclusion following orthodontic-orthognathic surgery.
Zhou Y; Sun Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Sep; 37(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 12425856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between transverse dental anomalies and skeletal asymmetry.
Kusayama M; Motohashi N; Kuroda T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 12637905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of dental decompensation on the surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism.
Capelozza Filho L; Martins A; Mazzotini R; da Silva Filho OG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 9046637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing Stability of Mandibular Setback Versus 2-Jaw Surgery in Class III Patients With Minimal Presurgical Orthodontics.
Larson BE; Lee NK; Jang MJ; Yun PY; Kim JW; Kim YK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 75(6):1240-1248. PubMed ID: 28232010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthodontic compensation in skeletal Class III malocclusion: a case report.
de Figueiredo MA; Siqueira DF; Bommarito S; Scanavini MA
World J Orthod; 2007; 8(4):385-96. PubMed ID: 18092524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage.
Troy BA; Shanker S; Fields HW; Vig K; Johnston W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):146.e1-9; discussion 146-7. PubMed ID: 19201319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthognathic surgery in the young cleft patient: preliminary study on subsequent facial growth.
Wolford LM; Cassano DS; Cottrell DA; El Deeb M; Karras SC; Goncalves JR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2524-36. PubMed ID: 19022133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Presurgical and postsurgical orthodontics in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Baik HS
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1771-5. PubMed ID: 19816349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class III patients with long face problems: a retrospective study.
Cao Y; Zhou Y; Li Z
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):1032-8. PubMed ID: 19375014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
