These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20494223)

  • 1. When less is more: using shrinkage to increase accuracy.
    Wears RL; Normand SL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Jun; 55(6):553-5. PubMed ID: 20494223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studying the prevention of acute kidney injury: lessons from an 18th-century mathematician.
    Chertow GM; Palevsky PM; Greene T
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Sep; 1(5):1124-7. PubMed ID: 17699335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size reestimation by Bayesian prediction.
    Wang MD
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):365-77. PubMed ID: 17623342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mixtures of prior distributions for predictive Bayesian sample size calculations in clinical trials.
    Brutti P; De Santis F; Gubbiotti S
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(17):2185-201. PubMed ID: 19462415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size and the probability of a successful trial.
    Chuang-Stein C
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 17128428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistics and the relationship of clinical research to clinical practice.
    Khuder SA; Kahaleh B
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 19208555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size calculation for the van Elteren test adjusting for ties.
    Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Mei Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 18991111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates, power and sample size calculations for two-sample ordinal outcomes under before-after study designs.
    Strickland PA; Lu SE
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1807-18. PubMed ID: 12754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.
    Daimon T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Literature review: January-March 2008.
    Patterson SD; Carroll K
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 18428118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size allocation to regions in a multiregional trial.
    Uesaka H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):580-94. PubMed ID: 20183427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nonparametric two-sample comparison for skewed data with unequal variances.
    Skovlund E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):594-5. PubMed ID: 20056384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis and importance of statistical power and sample size in empirical scientific research].
    Klimek KM
    Wiad Lek; 2008; 61(7-9):211-5. PubMed ID: 19172834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal sample size for a series of pilot trials of new agents.
    Yao TJ; Begg CB; Livingston PO
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):992-1001. PubMed ID: 8805764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The choice of sample size: a mixed Bayesian / frequentist approach.
    Pezeshk H; Nematollahi N; Maroufy V; Gittins J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2009 Apr; 18(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 18445695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical shrinkage estimator for consistency assessment of treatment effects in multi-regional clinical trials.
    Quan H; Li M; Shih WJ; Ouyang SP; Chen J; Zhang J; Zhao PL
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(10):1691-706. PubMed ID: 22855311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.
    Yeo A; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A behavioral Bayes method to determine the sample size of a clinical trial considering efficacy and safety.
    Kikuchi T; Gittins J
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2293-306. PubMed ID: 19536745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
    Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying and assessing the null hypothesis.
    Luft HS
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Feb; 34(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 10654829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.