219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20494308)
21. Multicentric and contralateral invasive tumors identified with pre-op MRI in patients newly diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Hollingsworth AB; Stough RG
Breast J; 2012 Sep; 18(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 22804792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ].
Nadrljanski M; Milosević Z; Plesinac-Karapandzić V; Goldner B
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2013; 141(5-6):402-8. PubMed ID: 23858817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component.
Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Tjalma WA; De Schepper A; Weyler J; Parizel PM
Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 17223002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Mammography in the Preoperative Detection and Measurement of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Retrospective Analysis.
Preibsch H; Beckmann J; Pawlowski J; Kloth C; Hahn M; Staebler A; Wietek BM; Nikolaou K; Wiesinger B
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):760-765. PubMed ID: 30149976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US.
LaTrenta LR; Menell JH; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD; Liberman L
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):856-61. PubMed ID: 12773685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [MRI outstands mammogram in sensitivity of breast ductal carcinoma in situ:an analysis of 122 cases].
Yu QX; Chen XS; Wu JY; Han BS; He JR; Zhu L; Chen WG; Li YF; Tan L; Chai WM; Wang DB; Fei XC; Yuan F; Jin XL; Shen KW; Li HW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 23578423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Caparrós FX; Fernández PL
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 23758454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinics in diagnostic imaging (180). Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Tan EJ; Moey T; Madhukumar P; Leong LC
Singapore Med J; 2017 Oct; 58(10):585-592. PubMed ID: 29119195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Orel SG; Mendonca MH; Reynolds C; Schnall MD; Solin LJ; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 9015067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. DCIS of the breast: The value of preoperative MRI.
Doyle AJ; Prakash S; Wang K; Cranshaw I; Taylor E; Oldfield R
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 26810138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of false-negative cases of breast MR imaging in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Obdeijn IM; Loo CE; Rijnsburger AJ; Wasser MN; Bergers E; Kok T; Klijn JG; Boetes C
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 19876732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A multiparametric serum marker panel as a complementary test to mammography for the diagnosis of node-negative early-stage breast cancer and DCIS in young women.
Lacombe J; Mangé A; Bougnoux AC; Prassas I; Solassol J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1834-42. PubMed ID: 24957886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement.
Neubauer H; Li M; Kuehne-Heid R; Schneider A; Kaiser WA
Br J Radiol; 2003 Jan; 76(901):3-12. PubMed ID: 12595319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution MRI using a microscopy coil for patients with presumed DCIS following mammography screening.
Zhu J; Kurihara Y; Kanemaki Y; Ogata H; Fukuda M; Nakajima Y; Maeda I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 17154376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast].
Winnekendonk G; Krug B; Warm M; Göhring UJ; Mallmann P; Lackner K
Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.
Lynge E; Ponti A; James T; Májek O; von Euler-Chelpin M; Anttila A; Fitzpatrick P; Frigerio A; Kawai M; Scharpantgen A; Broeders M; Hofvind S; Vidal C; Ederra M; Salas D; Bulliard JL; Tomatis M; Kerlikowske K; Taplin S;
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 24041876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening.
Bick U; Engelken F; Diederichs G; Dzyuballa R; Ortmann M; Fallenberg EM
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):849-56. PubMed ID: 23740312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
