These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20494312)

  • 1. A clinical oncologic perspective on breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Bloom S; Morrow M
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):277-94, ix. PubMed ID: 20494312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].
    Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of the diagnostic methods on the therapeutic strategies.
    Greco M; Agresti R; Giovanazzi R
    Q J Nucl Med; 1998 Mar; 42(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 9646647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of breast imaging following mastectomy with or without reconstruction in an outpatient community center.
    Destounis S; Morgan R; Arieno A; Seifert P; Somerville P; Murphy P
    Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 21695517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy.
    Belli P; Pastore G; Romani M; Terribile D; Canadè A; Costantini M
    Rays; 2002; 27(4):241-57. PubMed ID: 12696288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy.
    Preda L; Villa G; Rizzo S; Bazzi L; Origgi D; Cassano E; Bellomi M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(5):R53. PubMed ID: 16959028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging for screening, diagnosis, and eligibility for breast-conserving surgery: promises and pitfalls.
    Morrow M
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2010 Jul; 19(3):475-92. PubMed ID: 20620922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limiting breast surgery to the proper minimum.
    Morrow M
    Breast; 2005 Dec; 14(6):523-6. PubMed ID: 16169222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR imaging: its current and potential utility in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer.
    Kumar NA; Schnall MD
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2000 Nov; 8(4):715-28. PubMed ID: 11149675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR imaging in the evaluation of equivocal clinical and imaging findings of the breast.
    Leung JW
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):295-308, ix-x. PubMed ID: 20494313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.
    Bilimoria KY; Cambic A; Hansen NM; Bethke KP
    Arch Surg; 2007 May; 142(5):441-5; discussion 445-7. PubMed ID: 17515485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR imaging evaluation of cancer extent: is there clinical relevance?
    Schnall M
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Aug; 14(3):379-81, vii. PubMed ID: 17098178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy.
    Hwang N; Schiller DE; Crystal P; Maki E; McCready DR
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3000-9. PubMed ID: 19603233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A case of fat necrosis after breast quadrantectomy in which preoperative diagnosis was enabled by MRI with fat suppression technique.
    Iwasaki H; Morimoto K; Koh M; Okamura T; Wakasa K; Wakasa T; Kinoshita H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 22(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 15010123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of MR imaging in the assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
    Mann RM
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):259-76, ix. PubMed ID: 20494311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indications for MR mammography. A Belgian study.
    Van Goethem M; Biltjes IG; De Schepper AM
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Jun; 83(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 11025925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
    Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectives.
    Sakorafas GH; Tsiotou AG
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2000 Apr; 26(2):103-25. PubMed ID: 10772968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis.
    Boyages J; Delaney G; Taylor R
    Cancer; 1999 Feb; 85(3):616-28. PubMed ID: 10091735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnostic problems in local recurrence after breast saving therapy of breast cancer].
    Mennel C; Tulusan AH; Reitzenstein M; Ronay G; Willgeroth F; Lang N
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Apr; 51(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 1860658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.