122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2049478)
21. Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples.
Meintker L; Ringwald J; Rauh M; Krause SW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 May; 139(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 23596116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automated flow cytometric analysis of blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid: analytic performance.
Aune MW; Becker JL; Brugnara C; Canfield W; Dorfman DM; Fiehn W; Fischer G; Fitzpatrick P; Flaming TH; Henriksen HK; Kunicka JE; Lackner KJ; Minchello E; Mullenix PA; Myers M; Petersen A; Ternstrom W; Wilson SJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 May; 121(5):690-700. PubMed ID: 15151209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A stable human platelet-white blood cell control for the Coulter Model S-Plus II.
Lombarts AJ; Leijnse B
Clin Chim Acta; 1983 May; 130(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 6851185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An evaluation of the utility of performing body fluid counts on the coulter LH 750.
Barnes PW; Eby CS; Shimer G
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 15479646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the white blood cell differential given by the new analyser Coulter STKS in both hematological and non-hematological patient groups.
Fialon P; Becker M; Boisseau MR
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1990 Sep; 38(7):743-8. PubMed ID: 2235091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Enumeration of residual white blood cells in leukoreduced blood products: Comparing flow cytometry with a portable microscopic cell counter.
Castegnaro S; Dragone P; Chieregato K; Alghisi A; Rodeghiero F; Astori G
Transfus Apher Sci; 2016 Apr; 54(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 26515432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated flow cytometric analysis of blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid.
Sandhaus LM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jan; 123(1):154; author reply 154. PubMed ID: 15762292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Toward a reference method for leukocyte differential counts in blood: comparison of three flow cytometric candidate methods.
Roussel M; Davis BH; Fest T; Wood BL;
Cytometry A; 2012 Nov; 81(11):973-82. PubMed ID: 22736499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Differential leukocyte counting with a new automatic particle counter].
Tvede K; Hansen FR; Wimberley PD; Partoft T
Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Dec; 149(52):3535-9. PubMed ID: 3433568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical evaluation of leukocyte differential count in peripheral blood by five-color flow cytometry].
Xing Y; Wang JZ; Pu CW; Shang K
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 93(30):2392-6. PubMed ID: 24300210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Japanese Society for Laboratory Hematology flow cytometric reference method of determining the differential leukocyte count: external quality assurance using fresh blood samples.
Kawai Y; Nagai Y; Ogawa E; Kondo H
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Apr; 39(2):202-222. PubMed ID: 28013527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Usefulness of immunoplatelet measurement using the flow cytometric method for accurate platelet counting in hematological patients with severe thrombocytopenia].
Nishiyama M; Hayashi S; Futsukaichi Y; Suehisa E; Kurata Y
Rinsho Byori; 2004 Feb; 52(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 15027312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Use of a fully mechanized differentiation system in the hematologic laboratory. I: Development and mechanisms of the Hematrak 590 differentiation system; reproducibility and reliability of differentiation of smears with normal blood cell elements].
Grunewald RW; Schauseil S; Rick W
Internist (Berl); 1987 Oct; 28(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 3316100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [The progresses in the determination of blood monocytosis and its perspectives of clinical application in pathology].
Flandrin G; Valensi F; Mazon C; Sassier P
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1993; 51(9):787-91. PubMed ID: 8166391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Peripheral blood monocyte counting: towards a new reference method.
Hübl W; Andert S; Erath A; Lapin A; Bayer PM
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Nov; 33(11):839-45. PubMed ID: 8620061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of a CD61 MoAb method for enumeration of platelets in thrombocytopenic patients and its impact on the transfusion decision-making process.
Arroyo JL; García-Marcos MA; López A; Menéndez P; Tabernero MD; Sánchez-Abarca LI; Avila-Zarza C; San Miguel JF; Orfao A
Transfusion; 2001 Oct; 41(10):1212-6. PubMed ID: 11606818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of performance for leukocyte differential counting of the Technicon H6000 system with a manual reference method using the NCCLS standard.
Breakell ES; Marchand A; Marcus R; Simson E
Blood Cells; 1985; 11(2):257-79. PubMed ID: 3834964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computer aided manual leucocyte differential counting.
Eggert AA; Becker DJ; Emmerich KA; Matthews RA; Eggert RM
J Med Syst; 1989 Jun; 13(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 2794818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the automated leucocyte count and differential from the Cell-Dyn 3500 in sickle cell disease.
Joyner RE; Brooks MJ
Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Dec; 17(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 8697728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new method for fish leucocyte counting and partial differentiation by flow cytometry.
Inoue T; Moritomo T; Tamura Y; Mamiya S; Fujino H; Nakanishi T
Fish Shellfish Immunol; 2002 Nov; 13(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 12458744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
