These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20494867)

  • 1. Multiple goal management starts with attention: goal prioritizing affects the allocation of spatial attention to goal-relevant events.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Crombez G
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 20494867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Moors A; Van Damme S; Crombez G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 20079475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additive effects of emotional, endogenous, and exogenous attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Brosch T; Pourtois G; Sander D; Vuilleumier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1779-87. PubMed ID: 21382388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Mar; 24(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 23172773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional selection of multiple goal positions before rapid hand movement sequences: an event-related potential study.
    Baldauf D; Deubel H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 18510446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The premotor theory of attention as an account for the Simon effect.
    Van der Lubbe RH; Abrahamse EL; De Kleine E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 22426428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention.
    Chambers CD; Payne JM; Stokes MG; Mattingley JB
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 7(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 14983182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences.
    Godijn R; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):882-96. PubMed ID: 14585012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reflexive shifts of covert attention operate in an egocentric coordinate frame.
    Barrett DJ; Bradshaw MF; Rose D; Everatt J; Simpson PJ
    Perception; 2001; 30(9):1083-91. PubMed ID: 11694084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlled attention allocation mediates the relation between goal-oriented pursuit and approach-avoidance reactions to negative stimuli.
    Ernst LH; Weidner A; Ehlis AC; Fallgatter AJ
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 91(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 22922017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional.
    Jonikaitis D; Schubert T; Deubel H
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):23. PubMed ID: 21172898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The amplitude of N2pc reflects the physical disparity between target item and distracters.
    Zhao G; Liu Q; Zhang Y; Jiao J; Zhang Q; Sun H; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 491(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21215298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competing for attentional priority: temporary goals versus threats.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Crombez G; Van Damme S
    Emotion; 2013 Jun; 13(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 22309730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.