BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20495804)

  • 1. Evaluation of effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging for three flat-panel-detector angiography systems.
    Suzuki S; Yamaguchi I; Kidouchi T; Yamamoto A; Masumoto T; Ozaki Y
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Apr; 34(2):376-82. PubMed ID: 20495804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system.
    Suzuki S; Furui S; Yamaguchi I; Yamagishi M; Watanabe A; Abe T; Kobayashi I
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):545-50. PubMed ID: 19188322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Entrance surface dose during three-dimensional imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system.
    Suzuki S; Furui S; Yamaguchi I; Yamagishi M; Abe T; Kobayashi I; Haruyama T
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 19(9):1361-5. PubMed ID: 18725100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of the correlation between dose area product and effective dose in vascular radiology.
    Smans K; Struelens L; Hoornaert MT; Bleeser F; Buls N; Berus D; Clerinx P; Malchair F; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 18310610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose conversion coefficients calculated using tomographic phantom, KTMAN-2, for X-ray examination of cardiac catheterisation.
    Park SH; Lee JK; Lee C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17766255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of patient effective dose of neurovascular imaging protocols for C-arm cone-beam CT.
    Wang C; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Jiang X; Ferrell A; Smith T; Yoshizumi T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):1072-7. PubMed ID: 24758663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose from 3D rotational X-ray imaging: organ and effective dose with conversion factors.
    Kim S; Sopko D; Toncheva G; Enterline D; Keijzers B; Yoshizumi TT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 21926088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective patient dose during neuroradiological C-arm CT procedures.
    Bai M; Liu X; Liu B
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 23266966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose and risk from fluoroscopically guided percutaneous transhepatic biliary procedures.
    Stratakis J; Damilakis J; Hatzidakis A; Perisinakis K; Gourtsoyiannis N
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Jan; 17(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 16415136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination.
    Staton RJ; Lee C; Lee C; Williams MD; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5151-66. PubMed ID: 17019030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT dosimetry: getting the best from the adult Cristy phantom.
    Castellano IA; Dance DR; Evans PM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):321-5. PubMed ID: 15933130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 6: conversion factors for reconstruction of organ dose in abdominal radiography].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):945-61. PubMed ID: 19517339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual energy versus single energy MDCT: measurement of radiation dose using adult abdominal imaging protocols.
    Ho LM; Yoshizumi TT; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC; Marin D; Toncheva G; Schindera ST
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1400-7. PubMed ID: 19596594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Radiation exposure with 3D rotational angiography of the skull].
    Gosch D; Kurze W; Deckert F; Schulz T; Patz A; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Sep; 178(9):880-5. PubMed ID: 16953480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of entrance skin dose and estimation of organ dose during pediatric chest radiography.
    Kumaresan M; Kumar R; Biju K; Choubey A; Kantharia S
    Health Phys; 2011 Jun; 100(6):654-7. PubMed ID: 22004934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective dose in percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage examination using PCXMC2.0 and MCNP5 Monte Carlo codes.
    Karavasilis E; Dimitriadis A; Gonis H; Pappas P; Georgiou E; Yakoumakis E
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 24374260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of radiation dose between different fluoroscopy systems in the modern catheterization laboratory: Results from bench testing using an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Christopoulos G; Christakopoulos GE; Rangan BV; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Latif F; Abu-Fadel M; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 26010374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.