255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20496208)
1. Bayesian estimation for performance measures of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.
Aragon DC; Martinez EZ; Achcar JA
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):821-34. PubMed ID: 20496208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.
Paul M; Riebler A; Bachmann LM; Rue H; Held L
Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1325-39. PubMed ID: 20101670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian semi-parametric ROC analysis.
Erkanli A; Sung M; Costello EJ; Angold A
Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3905-28. PubMed ID: 16416403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard.
Black MA; Craig BA
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2653-69. PubMed ID: 12228883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
Hossain S; Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Is the HPV test to supplement vaginal smears in menopausal women?].
Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Lindell M; Wilander E
Lakartidningen; 2010 Feb 24-Mar 2; 107(8):528-9. PubMed ID: 20384066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian approach to average power calculations for binary regression models with misclassified outcomes.
Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):848-63. PubMed ID: 19061210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian sample-size determination for inference on two binomial populations with no gold standard classifier.
Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):2963-76. PubMed ID: 16007574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
Lele SR; Dennis B; Lutscher F
Ecol Lett; 2007 Jul; 10(7):551-63. PubMed ID: 17542934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20552570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The utility of prior information and stratification for parameter estimation with two screening tests but no gold standard.
Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1203-17. PubMed ID: 15558709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
