226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20497164)
1. Physiologic benefits of pulsatile perfusion during mechanical circulatory support for the treatment of acute and chronic heart failure in adults.
Guan Y; Karkhanis T; Wang S; Rider A; Koenig SC; Slaughter MS; El Banayosy A; Undar A
Artif Organs; 2010 Jul; 34(7):529-36. PubMed ID: 20497164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac extracorporeal life support: state of the art in 2007.
Cooper DS; Jacobs JP; Moore L; Stock A; Gaynor JW; Chancy T; Parpard M; Griffin DA; Owens T; Checchia PA; Thiagarajan RR; Spray TL; Ravishankar C
Cardiol Young; 2007 Sep; 17 Suppl 2():104-15. PubMed ID: 18039404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac prosthesis as an advanced surgical therapy for end-stage cardiac patients: current status and future perspectives.
Takatani S
J Med Dent Sci; 2000 Sep; 47(3):151-65. PubMed ID: 12160228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pulsatile ECMO and VAD: a dual use of a new device in pediatric cardiac patients.
Agati S; Ciccarello G; Ocello S; Salvo D; Marcelletti C; Undar A; Mignosa C
ASAIO J; 2006; 52(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 16966845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assist devices for circulatory support in therapy-refractory acute heart failure.
Koerner MM; Jahanyar J
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2008 Jul; 23(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 18520726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of mechanical circulatory support devices in China.
Wang W; Zhu DM; Ding WX
Artif Organs; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1009-14. PubMed ID: 20021474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device.
Pagani FD; Miller LW; Russell SD; Aaronson KD; John R; Boyle AJ; Conte JV; Bogaev RC; MacGillivray TE; Naka Y; Mancini D; Massey HT; Chen L; Klodell CT; Aranda JM; Moazami N; Ewald GA; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Jul; 54(4):312-21. PubMed ID: 19608028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical circulatory support therapy as a bridge to transplant or recovery (new advances).
Kirklin JK; Holman WL
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2006 Mar; 21(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 16470148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. State of the art: implantable ventricular assist devices.
Lahpor JR
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2009 Oct; 14(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 19667990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation.
Miller LW; Pagani FD; Russell SD; John R; Boyle AJ; Aaronson KD; Conte JV; Naka Y; Mancini D; Delgado RM; MacGillivray TE; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH;
N Engl J Med; 2007 Aug; 357(9):885-96. PubMed ID: 17761592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical circulatory support devices improve tissue perfusion in patients with end-stage heart failure or cardiogenic shock.
den Uil CA; Maat AP; Lagrand WK; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Thiel RJ; Spronk PE; Simoons ML
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Sep; 28(9):906-11. PubMed ID: 19716043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Left ventricular device as destination therapy: are we there yet?
Badiwala MV; Rao V
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 24(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 19532106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current axial-flow devices--the HeartMate II and Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist devices.
John R
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008; 20(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 19038737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.
John R; Pagani FD; Naka Y; Boyle A; Conte JV; Russell SD; Klodell CT; Milano CA; Rogers J; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 20447659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bridge to transplant experience: factors influencing survival to and after cardiac transplant.
Smedira NG; Hoercher KJ; Yoon DY; Rajeswaran J; Klingman L; Starling RC; Blackstone EH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1295-305, 1305.e1-4. PubMed ID: 20412961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of centrifugal, axial, and pulsatile left ventricular assist device support on end-organ function in heart failure patients.
Kamdar F; Boyle A; Liao K; Colvin-adams M; Joyce L; John R
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Apr; 28(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 19332262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Heart failure in children -- mechanical assistance.
Deiwick M; Hoffmeier A; Tjan TD; Krasemann T; Schmid C; Scheld HH
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 53 Suppl 2():S135-40. PubMed ID: 15704036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. History of mechanical circulatory support.
Helman DN; Rose EA
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2000; 43(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10935552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cellular and hemodynamics responses of failing myocardium to continuous flow mechanical circulatory support using the DeBakey-Noon left ventricular assist device: a comparative analysis with pulsatile-type devices.
Thohan V; Stetson SJ; Nagueh SF; Rivas-Gotz C; Koerner MM; Lafuente JA; Loebe M; Noon GP; Torre-Amione G
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 May; 24(5):566-75. PubMed ID: 15896754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients.
Feller ED; Sorensen EN; Haddad M; Pierson RN; Johnson FL; Brown JM; Griffith BP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Mar; 83(3):1082-8. PubMed ID: 17307463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
