These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20497626)

  • 1. How to do a meta-analysis.
    Field AP; Gillett R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):665-94. PubMed ID: 20497626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studies.
    Hafdahl AR; Williams MA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 19271846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the regression slopes of independent groups.
    Ng M; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):319-40. PubMed ID: 19807946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian analysis of mixtures in structural equation models with non-ignorable missing data.
    Cai JH; Song XY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):491-508. PubMed ID: 20030969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.
    Sinharay S; Stern HS; Russell D
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 11778675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting a lack of association: an equivalence testing approach.
    Goertzen JR; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):527-37. PubMed ID: 20030968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication bias in research synthesis: sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions.
    Vevea JL; Woods CM
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):428-43. PubMed ID: 16392998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research.
    Berkeljon A; Baldwin SA
    Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):511-8. PubMed ID: 20183404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separating response-execution bias from decision bias: arguments for an additional parameter in Ratcliff's diffusion model.
    Voss A; Voss J; Klauer KC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):539-55. PubMed ID: 20030967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review.
    Clatworthy J; Buick D; Hankins M; Weinman J; Horne R
    Br J Health Psychol; 2005 Sep; 10(Pt 3):329-58. PubMed ID: 16238852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis: current issues in research synthesis.
    Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1253-7; discussion 1259-62. PubMed ID: 8817799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.