These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20498350)

  • 1. Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support.
    Núñez Castellar E; Kühn S; Fias W; Notebaert W
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2010 May; 10(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 20498350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False external feedback modulates posterror slowing and the f-P300: implications for theories of posterror adjustment.
    Saunders B; Jentzsch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1210-6. PubMed ID: 22987148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing assessments of post-error slowing: A neurobehavioral investigation of a flanker task.
    Schroder HS; Nickels S; Cardenas E; Breiger M; Perlo S; Pizzagalli DA
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13473. PubMed ID: 31536142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional 5-HT1a receptor polymorphism selectively modulates error-specific subprocesses of performance monitoring.
    Beste C; Domschke K; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Baffa A; Falkenstein M; Konrad C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Apr; 31(4):621-30. PubMed ID: 19780043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speeding before and slowing after errors: is it all just strategy?
    Dudschig C; Jentzsch I
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1296():56-62. PubMed ID: 19679114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the bottleneck account for post-error slowing beyond the post-error response.
    Lavro D; Ben-Shachar MS; Saville CWN; Klein C; Berger A
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Oct; 138():81-90. PubMed ID: 30121286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance monitoring and the causal attribution of errors.
    Steinhauser M; Kiesel A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 11(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 21573741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of posterror slowing.
    Jentzsch I; Dudschig C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 18720281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex differences in error-related performance monitoring.
    Larson MJ; South M; Clayson PE
    Neuroreport; 2011 Jan; 22(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21304441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frontal theta band oscillations predict error correction and posterror slowing in typing.
    Kalfaoğlu Ç; Stafford T; Milne E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 28447844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the correct side of performance: Processing of internal and external signals in response speed evaluation.
    Valt C; Stürmer B
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jul; 117():26-36. PubMed ID: 28408136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When the outcome is different than expected: Subjective expectancy shapes reward prediction error at the FRN level.
    Walentowska W; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13456. PubMed ID: 31403188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrocortical and behavioral measures of response monitoring in young children during a Go/No-Go task.
    Torpey DC; Hajcak G; Kim J; Kujawa A; Klein DN
    Dev Psychobiol; 2012 Mar; 54(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 21815136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Error-induced adaptability: Behavioral and neural dynamics of response-stimulus interval modulations on posterror slowing.
    Li Q; Hu N; Li Y; Long Q; Gu Y; Tang Y; Chen A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 May; 150(5):851-863. PubMed ID: 33001683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heart work after errors: Behavioral adjustment following error commission involves cardiac effort.
    Spruit IM; Wilderjans TF; van Steenbergen H
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):375-388. PubMed ID: 29464553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of performance monitoring.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 11(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 21264645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinct neural processes support post-success and post-error slowing in the stop signal task.
    Zhang Y; Ide JS; Zhang S; Hu S; Valchev NS; Tang X; Li CR
    Neuroscience; 2017 Aug; 357():273-284. PubMed ID: 28627420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reward contingencies and the recalibration of task monitoring and reward systems: a high-density electrical mapping study.
    Morie KP; De Sanctis P; Foxe JJ
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jul; 273():100-17. PubMed ID: 24836852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lesions to the prefrontal performance-monitoring network disrupt neural processing and adaptive behaviors after both errors and novelty.
    Wessel JR; Klein TA; Ott DV; Ullsperger M
    Cortex; 2014 Jan; 50():45-54. PubMed ID: 24139890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empathy and error processing.
    Larson MJ; Fair JE; Good DA; Baldwin SA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 May; 47(3):415-24. PubMed ID: 20030764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.