265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20498397)
1. Reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies.
Lebeau A; Turzynski A; Braun S; Behrhof W; Fleige B; Schmitt WD; Grob TJ; Burkhardt L; Hölzel D; Jackisch C; Thomssen C; Müller V; Untch M
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jul; 28(20):3264-70. PubMed ID: 20498397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastroesophageal cancer: correlation between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Tafe LJ; Janjigian YY; Zaidinski M; Hedvat CV; Hameed MR; Tang LH; Hicks JB; Shah MA; Barbashina V
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1460-5. PubMed ID: 22032573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HER2 status in breast cancer determined by IHC and FISH: comparison of the results.
Mrozkowiak A; Olszewski WP; Piaścik A; Olszewski WT
Pol J Pathol; 2004; 55(4):165-71. PubMed ID: 15757204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assessment in a case-control study: comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction performed by central laboratories.
Baehner FL; Achacoso N; Maddala T; Shak S; Quesenberry CP; Goldstein LC; Gown AM; Habel LA
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Oct; 28(28):4300-6. PubMed ID: 20697093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chromogenic in situ hybridization is a reliable method for detecting HER2 gene status in breast cancer: a multicenter study using conventional scoring criteria and the new ASCO/CAP recommendations.
Gong Y; Sweet W; Duh YJ; Greenfield L; Fang Y; Zhao J; Tarco E; Symmans WF; Isola J; Sneige N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Apr; 131(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 19289584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurately assessing her-2/neu status in needle core biopsies of breast cancer patients in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: emerging questions and considerations addressed.
D'Alfonso T; Liu YF; Monni S; Rosen PP; Shin SJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Apr; 34(4):575-81. PubMed ID: 20216378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different criteria for HER2 positivity by IHC can be applied in post-chemotherapy specimens in determining HER2 as a prognosticator in locally advanced breast cancer.
Moon YW; Jeung HC; Rha SY; Choi YH; Yang WI; Chung HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 104(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 17587181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amplification of the HER2 gene in breast cancers testing 2+ weak positive by HercepTest immunohistochemistry: false-positive or false-negative immunohistochemistry?
Barrett C; Magee H; O'Toole D; Daly S; Jeffers M
J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):690-3. PubMed ID: 16822876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HER2 analysis in breast cancer: reduced immunoreactivity in FISH non-informative cancer biopsies.
Tapia C; Schraml P; Simon R; Al-Kuraya KS; Maurer R; Mirlacher M; Novotny H; Spichtin H; Mihatsch MJ; Sauter G
Int J Oncol; 2004 Dec; 25(6):1551-7. PubMed ID: 15547690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.
Shah SS; Ketterling RP; Goetz MP; Ingle JN; Reynolds CA; Perez EA; Chen B
Hum Pathol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 19762065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of the change in cutoff values for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a study comparing conventional brightfield microscopy, image analysis-assisted microscopy, and interobserver variation.
Atkinson R; Mollerup J; Laenkholm AV; Verardo M; Hawes D; Commins D; Engvad B; Correa A; Ehlers CC; Nielsen KV
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 21809992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of chromogenic in situ hybridization on testing HER2 Status in breast carcinomas with chromosome 17 polysomy and equivocal (2+) herceptest results: a study of two institutions using the conventional and new ASCO/CAP scoring criteria.
Gong Y; Sweet W; Duh YJ; Greenfield L; Tarco E; Trivedi S; Symmans WF; Isola J; Sneige N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Aug; 132(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 19605817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HER2 immunohistochemistry significantly overestimates HER2 amplification in uterine papillary serous carcinomas.
Mentrikoski MJ; Stoler MH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Jun; 38(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 24698965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: biologic and methodologic considerations.
Sauter G; Lee J; Bartlett JM; Slamon DJ; Press MF
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(8):1323-33. PubMed ID: 19204209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment for HER-2/neu status in Taiwanese breast cancer patients.
Kuo SJ; Wang BB; Chang CS; Chen TH; Yeh KT; Lee DJ; Yin PL; Chen M
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 46(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 17638622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of HER2 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to predict benefit from dose escalation of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients.
Dressler LG; Berry DA; Broadwater G; Cowan D; Cox K; Griffin S; Miller A; Tse J; Novotny D; Persons DL; Barcos M; Henderson IC; Liu ET; Thor A; Budman D; Muss H; Norton L; Hayes DF
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 23(19):4287-97. PubMed ID: 15994142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing guidelines: a 3-year comparison of validation procedures.
Dyhdalo KS; Fitzgibbons PL; Goldsmith JD; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 138(7):876-84. PubMed ID: 24978913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Change in Pattern of HER2 Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Results in Breast Cancers Submitted for FISH Testing: Experience of a Reference Laboratory Using US Food and Drug Administration Criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines.
Shah MV; Wiktor AE; Meyer RG; Tenner KS; Ballman KV; Green SJ; Sukov WR; Ketterling RP; Perez EA; Jenkins RB
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3502-3510. PubMed ID: 27458302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
Varga Z; Noske A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in primary breast cancer in the era of standardized testing: a Canadian prospective study.
Hanna WM; Barnes PJ; Chang MC; Gilks CB; Magliocco AM; Rees H; Quenneville L; Robertson SJ; SenGupta SK; Nofech-Mozes S
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Dec; 32(35):3967-73. PubMed ID: 25385731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
