These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20498408)

  • 1. Comparison of anticancer drug coverage decisions in the United States and United Kingdom: does the evidence support the rhetoric?
    Mason A; Drummond M; Ramsey S; Campbell J; Raisch D
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jul; 28(20):3234-8. PubMed ID: 20498408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing patient access to pharmaceuticals in the UK and US.
    Cohen J; Cairns C; Paquette C; Faden L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2006; 5(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 17132032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the Approval and Coverage Decisions of New Oncology Drugs in the United States and Other Selected Countries.
    Zhang Y; Hueser HC; Hernandez I
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):247-254. PubMed ID: 28125371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Coverage in England of Cancer Drugs Qualifying for US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval.
    Cherla A; Naci H; Kesselheim AS; Gyawali B; Mossialos E
    JAMA Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 181(4):490-498. PubMed ID: 33616607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in cancer drug assessment between Spain and the United Kingdom.
    Lozano-Blázquez A; Dickson R; Fraga-Fuentes MD; Martínez-Martínez F; Calleja-Hernández MÁ
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Sep; 51(13):1843-52. PubMed ID: 26119375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The lag from FDA approval to published cost-utility evidence.
    Chambers JD; Thorat T; Pyo J; Neumann PJ
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Jun; 15(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 25579324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compared to US practice, evidence-based reviews in Europe appear to lead to lower prices for some drugs.
    Cohen J; Malins A; Shahpurwala Z
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Apr; 32(4):762-70. PubMed ID: 23569057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical benefit, reimbursement outcomes, and prices of FDA-approved cancer drugs reviewed through Project Orbis in the USA, Canada, England, and Scotland: a retrospective, comparative analysis.
    Jenei K; Gentilini A; Haslam A; Prasad V
    Lancet Oncol; 2024 Aug; 25(8):979-988. PubMed ID: 39004098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient access to pharmaceuticals: an international comparison.
    Cohen J; Faden L; Predaris S; Young B
    Eur J Health Econ; 2007 Sep; 8(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 17279403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coverage of Novel Therapeutic Agents by Medicare Prescription Drug Plans Following FDA Approval.
    Shaw DL; Dhruva SS; Ross JS
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Dec; 24(12):1230-1238. PubMed ID: 30479199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.
    Clement FM; Harris A; Li JJ; Yong K; Lee KM; Manns BJ
    JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(13):1437-43. PubMed ID: 19809025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balancing early access with uncertainties in evidence for drugs authorized by prospective case series - systematic review of reimbursement decisions.
    Wallerstedt SM; Henriksson M
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 84(6):1146-1155. PubMed ID: 29381234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient access to new cancer drugs in the United States and Australia.
    Wilson A; Cohen J
    Value Health; 2011; 14(6):944-52. PubMed ID: 21914517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in the pricing and reimbursement of new anticancer drugs in South Korea: an analysis of listed anticancer drugs during the past three years.
    Kim S; Kim J; Cho H; Lee K; Ryu C; Lee JH
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Jun; 21(3):479-488. PubMed ID: 33275463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE)].
    Rothgang H; Niebuhr D; Wasem J; Gress S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004 May; 66(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 15141350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sipuleucel-T (Provenge(®))-Autopsy of an Innovative Paradigm Change in Cancer Treatment: Why a Single-Product Biotech Company Failed to Capitalize on its Breakthrough Invention.
    Jarosławski S; Toumi M
    BioDrugs; 2015 Oct; 29(5):301-7. PubMed ID: 26403092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Medicare's New Technology Add-on Payment Program for Blinatumomab.
    Dhruva SS; Prasad V
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Feb; 2(2):165-6. PubMed ID: 26720844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continental Divide? The attitudes of US and Canadian oncologists on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and health policies associated with new cancer drugs.
    Berry SR; Bell CM; Ubel PA; Evans WK; Nadler E; Strevel EL; Neumann PJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Sep; 28(27):4149-53. PubMed ID: 20697077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicare covers the majority of FDA-approved devices and Part B drugs, but restrictions and discrepancies remain.
    Chambers JD; May KE; Neumann PJ
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Jun; 32(6):1109-15. PubMed ID: 23733986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of pharmacoeconomic evaluations submitted for reimbursement in Korea.
    Yim EY; Lim SH; Oh MJ; Park HK; Gong JR; Park SE; Yi SY
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S104-10. PubMed ID: 22265055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.