297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20498561)
1. Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results.
Barr RG
Ultrasound Q; 2010 Jun; 26(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 20498561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The utility of the "bull's-eye" artifact on breast elasticity imaging in reducing breast lesion biopsy rate.
Barr RG; Lackey AE
Ultrasound Q; 2011 Sep; 27(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 21873851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical experience with elasticity imaging in a community-based breast center.
Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R; Murphy P; Seifert P; Somerville P; Young W
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Feb; 32(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 23341386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions.
Zhu QL; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Liu H; Sun Q; Dai Q; Chen X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1232-8. PubMed ID: 18359145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions].
Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Aug; 32(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 20425688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.
Adamietz BR; Meier-Meitinger M; Fasching P; Beckmann M; Hartmann A; Uder M; Häberle L; Schulz-Wendtland R; Schwab SA
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21165816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial.
Barr RG; Destounis S; Lackey LB; Svensson WE; Balleyguier C; Smith C
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Feb; 31(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 22298872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.
Tanter M; Bercoff J; Athanasiou A; Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Montaldo G; Muller M; Tardivon A; Fink M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1373-86. PubMed ID: 18395961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Park SH; Chang JM; Jang M; Kim KG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1460-5. PubMed ID: 21098210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical experiences.
Hatzung G; Grunwald S; Zygmunt M; Geaid AA; Behrndt PO; Isermann R; Kohlmann T; Ohlinger R
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 20614414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tissue Doppler and strain imaging for evaluating tissue elasticity of breast lesions.
Thomas A; Warm M; Hoopmann M; Diekmann F; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 17434065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography.
Barr RG; Zhang Z
Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 25426770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
