These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20499265)

  • 1. Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Renier C; Zeyen T; Fieuws S; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I
    Int Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 30(6):651-9. PubMed ID: 20499265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry.
    Oncel B; Dinc U; Orge F; Yalvac B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):936-41. PubMed ID: 19882585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical description of Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.
    Lau W; Pye D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 May; 52(6):2911-6. PubMed ID: 21273535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma.
    Jordão ML; Costa VP; Rodrigues Mde L; Paula JS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 251(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 22555897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals.
    Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.