These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20499265)

  • 21. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Apr; 114(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 17141320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the ocular response analyzer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Feizi S; Hashemloo A; Rastegarpour A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5887-91. PubMed ID: 21447674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Repeatability and accuracy of applanation resonance tonometry in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 92(1):e66-73. PubMed ID: 23837834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repeatability and reproducibility of Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
    Wang AS; Alencar LM; Weinreb RN; Tafreshi A; Deokule S; Vizzeri G; Medeiros FA
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Feb; 22(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 21701395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
    Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4410-4. PubMed ID: 17003433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices.
    Lanza M; Rinaldi M; Carnevale UAG; di Staso S; Sconocchia MB; Costagliola C
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 30176825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
    Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Kouchaki B; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 29(2):92-97. PubMed ID: 28626817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Realini T; Weinreb RN; Hobbs G
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 19225347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals.
    Ito K; Tawara A; Kubota T; Harada Y
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21173706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients.
    Jimenez-Roman J; Gil-Carrasco F; Martinez A; Albis-Donado O; De la Torre-Tovar JD
    Int Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 23154897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
    Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.