These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20499329)

  • 21. Comments on 'Sequential methods for random-effects meta-analysis' by J. P. Higgins, A. Whitehead and M. Simmonds, Statistics in Medicine 2010; DOI: 10.1002/sim.4088.
    Imberger G; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2965-6. PubMed ID: 21969254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parameter accuracy in meta-analyses of factor structures.
    Gnambs T; Staufenbiel T
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):168-86. PubMed ID: 27286902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
    Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meta analytical structural equation modeling: comments on issues with current methods and viable alternatives.
    Yuan KH
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 27286905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-analysis.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(13):2116-27. PubMed ID: 25809462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bias of estimates of the number needed to treat.
    Duncan BW; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1837-48. PubMed ID: 15806616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
    Cappelleri JC; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH; de Ferranti SD; Aubert M; Chalmers TC; Lau J
    JAMA; 1996 Oct 23-30; 276(16):1332-8. PubMed ID: 8861993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bias resulting from the use of 'assay sensitivity' as an inclusion criterion for meta-analysis.
    Gelfand LA; Strunk DR; Tu XM; Noble RE; Derubeis RJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 16196080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Meta-analysis of observational studies with unmeasured confounders.
    McCandless LC
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Jan; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 22499731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in clinical research: a review of methods and applications.
    Verde PE; Ohmann C
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 26035469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How we do it: "The oral tube area method": a new method for self-assessment of nasal resistance.
    Pontoppidan JM
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 30(6):557-60. PubMed ID: 16402985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Methods for averaging alpha coefficients in reliability generalization studies].
    López-Pina JA; Sánchez-Meca J; López-López JA
    Psicothema; 2012 Feb; 24(1):161-6. PubMed ID: 22269380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Empirical versus natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis.
    Shuster JJ
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1260. PubMed ID: 24590731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comment on 'New confidence bounds for QT studies' by Dennis D. Boos, David Hoffman, Robert Kringle and Ji Zhang, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:3801-3817.
    Tsong Y; Zhang J; Zhong J
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(23):2936-8; author reply 2938. PubMed ID: 19777537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of meta-analytic statistical significance testing.
    Polanin JR; Pigott TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 26035470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. John P. A. Ioannidis.
    Ioannidis JP; Mullard A
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2014 May; 13(5):328-9. PubMed ID: 24751817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.