209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20499394)
1. Randomizing research participants: promoting balance and concealment in small samples.
Matthews EE; Cook PF; Terada M; Aloia MS
Res Nurs Health; 2010 Jun; 33(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 20499394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
Schouten HJ
Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sequentially adjusted randomization to force balance in controlled trials with unknown prevalence of covariates: application to alcoholism research.
Müller MJ; Scheurich A; Wetzel H; Szegedi A; Hautzinger M
Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 15642723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How important is exact balance in treatment and control sample sizes to evaluations?
Elliott MN; McCaffrey DF; Lockwood JR
J Subst Abuse Treat; 2007 Jul; 33(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 17376636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal multivariate matching before randomization.
Greevy R; Lu B; Silber JH; Rosenbaum P
Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):263-75. PubMed ID: 15054030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blinded assessment of treatment effects utilizing information about the randomization block length.
Miller F; Friede T; Kieser M
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(12):1690-706. PubMed ID: 19340815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chop-lump tests for vaccine trials.
Follmann D; Fay MP; Proschan M
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 19210727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing.
Schulz KF; Grimes DA
Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9310):966-70. PubMed ID: 11918933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving small-sample inference in group randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Westgate PM; Braun TM
Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 21213338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size calculation for the weighted rank statistics with paired survival data.
Jung SH
Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3350-65. PubMed ID: 18205148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
Villar J; Carroli G
Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs.
Atkinson AC
Biostatistics; 2003 Apr; 4(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 12925515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical efficiency in multiple-to-one comparison trials with optimal allocation ratio.
Zhang J; Zhang JJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 21191859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of conditional and unconditional randomization tests for highly stratified designs.
Flyer PA
Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1551-9. PubMed ID: 9883551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
Gu X; Lee JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequential monitoring of randomization tests: stratified randomization.
Zhang Y; Rosenberger WF; Smythe RT
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 17825016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample-size requirements for comparisons of two groups on repeated observations of a binary outcome.
Leon AC
Eval Health Prof; 2004 Mar; 27(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 14994558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
