These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2050049)

  • 1. Critical effective methods to detect genotoxic carcinogens and neoplasm-promoting agents.
    Weisburger JH; Williams GM
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Jan; 90():121-6. PubMed ID: 2050049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular epizootiology: assessment of exposure to genotoxic compounds in teleosts.
    Stein JE; Reichert WL; Varanasi U
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Dec; 102 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):19-23. PubMed ID: 7713027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hazard identification: efficiency of short-term tests in identifying germ cell mutagens and putative nongenotoxic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA; Bridges BA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Oct; 101 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):61-72. PubMed ID: 8143649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental genotoxicity monitoring using Salmonella typhimurium strains as indicator system.
    Cerná N; Hájek V; Stejskalová E; Dobiás L; Zudová Z; Rössner P
    Sci Total Environ; 1991 Jan; 101(1-2):139-47. PubMed ID: 2057763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of DNA adducts to identify human health risk from exposure to hazardous environmental pollutants: the increasing role of mass spectrometry in assessing biologically effective doses of genotoxic carcinogens.
    Farmer PB; Singh R
    Mutat Res; 2008; 659(1-2):68-76. PubMed ID: 18468947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro testing for carcinogens and mutagens.
    Santella RM
    Occup Med; 1987; 2(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 3306977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mutagens in surface waters: a review.
    Ohe T; Watanabe T; Wakabayashi K
    Mutat Res; 2004 Nov; 567(2-3):109-49. PubMed ID: 15572284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The monitoring of environmental mutagens/carcinogens. A perspective on tests predicting chemical mutagens/carcinogens in man.
    Anderson D
    Ecol Dis; 1982; 1(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 6765300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mutagenic hazards of aquatic sediments: a review.
    Chen G; White PA
    Mutat Res; 2004 Nov; 567(2-3):151-225. PubMed ID: 15572285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotoxicity of environmental agents assessed by the alkaline comet assay.
    Møller P
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005; 96 Suppl 1():1-42. PubMed ID: 15859009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of bacterial assay system for monitoring genotoxic complex mixtures in the occupational setting.
    Ong T; Stewart JD; Whong WZ
    IARC Sci Publ; 1990; (104):101-6. PubMed ID: 2228106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A carcinogens--methods for detecting environmental muta/carcinogens].
    Morimoto K; Koizumi A
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1985 Apr; 12(4):789-97. PubMed ID: 3885860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anomalous nonidentity between Salmonella genotoxicants and rodent carcinogens: nongenotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic noncarcinogens.
    Yoshikawa K
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Jan; 104(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 8834860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mutagenicity background monitoring of the River Don delta water].
    Chistiakov VA; Kornilov VN
    Genetika; 1991 Apr; 27(4):749-52. PubMed ID: 1908804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic toxicology in industry: perspectives and initiatives.
    Ashby J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Jan; 23(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 3882532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial urinary mutagenicity test for monitoring of exposure to genotoxic compounds: a review.
    Cerná M; Pastorková A
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2002 Sep; 10(3):124-9. PubMed ID: 12298345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
    Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.