122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20500587)
1. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway.
Hopkins C
Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 35(2):147-8; author reply 148. PubMed ID: 20500587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence.
Hopkins C; Earnshaw J; Roberts D
Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 20738348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Objective assessments of nasal obstruction (rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry)].
Naito K
Arerugi; 2009 Jun; 58(6):630-4. PubMed ID: 19571655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Acoustic rhinometry--examination technique and discussion of the recommendation of the Committee for Standardisation of Acoustic Rhinometry, European Rhinologic Association ].
Gotlib T; Samoliński B; Szczesnowicz-Dabrowska P
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2003 Jan; 14(79):79-81. PubMed ID: 12712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry].
Geißler K; Guntinas-Lichius O
Laryngorhinootologie; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 25723008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nasal airway volume and resistance to airflow.
Zhang G; Solomon P; Rival R; Fenton RS; Cole P
Am J Rhinol; 2008; 22(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 18702900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence.
André RF; Vuyk HD; Ahmed A; Graamans K; Nolst Trenité GJ
Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):518-25. PubMed ID: 20070760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence.
Nivatvongs W; Earnshaw J; Roberts D; Hopkins C
Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 36(2):181-2. PubMed ID: 21518281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nasal congestion and airway obstruction: the validity of available objective and subjective measures.
Schumacher MJ
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep; 2002 May; 2(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 11918867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway.
Barnes ML; White PS; Gardiner Q
Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 35(2):152-3; author reply 153. PubMed ID: 20500593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.
Naito K; Miyata S; Saito S; Sakurai K; Takeuchi K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 258(10):505-8. PubMed ID: 11829185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway.
Williams J; Kulendra K; Hanif J
Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 35(2):150-1; author reply 151-2. PubMed ID: 20500590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Correlation between four-phase rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry].
Cao CT; Han DM; Zhang L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 44(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 19558885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic rhinometry and its uses in rhinology and diagnosis of nasal obstruction.
Lal D; Corey JP
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2004 Nov; 12(4):397-405, v. PubMed ID: 15337107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Correlation between subjective assessment and objective measurement of nasal obstruction].
Zhang GH; Fenton RS; Rival R; Solomon P; Cole P; Li Y
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 43(7):484-9. PubMed ID: 18826113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence-based practice: functional rhinoplasty.
Cannon DE; Rhee JS
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2012 Oct; 45(5):1033-43. PubMed ID: 22980683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of optical rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry using nasal provocation testing.
Wüstenberg EG; Zahnert T; Hüttenbrink KB; Hummel T
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 17438248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Peak nasal inspiratory flowmeter in evaluation of nasal obstruction].
Ozturan O; Gürdal MM
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2010; 20(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 20465543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of optical rhinometry to acoustic rhinometry using nasal provocation testing with Dermatophagoides farinae.
Cheung EJ; Citardi MJ; Fakhri S; Cain J; Batra PS; Luong A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Aug; 143(2):290-3. PubMed ID: 20647137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responsiveness of acoustic rhinometry to septorhinoplasty by comparison with rhinomanometry and subjective instruments.
Ansari E; Rogister F; Lefebvre P; Tombu S; Poirrier AL
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Sep; 44(5):778-783. PubMed ID: 31220404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
