320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20500938)
1. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.
Jastrow N; Chaillet N; Roberge S; Morency AM; Lacasse Y; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):321-327. PubMed ID: 20500938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis.
Kok N; Wiersma IC; Opmeer BC; de Graaf IM; Mol BW; Pajkrt E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 23576473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Uharček P; Brešťanský A; Ravinger J; Máňová A; Zajacová M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):609-12. PubMed ID: 25814295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section.
Cheung VY
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2005 Jul; 27(7):674-81. PubMed ID: 16100622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness to Detect Uterine Scar Defect: Comparison of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Marchant I; Lessard L; Bergeron C; Jastrow N; Gauthier R; Girard M; Guerby P; Vachon-Marceau C; Maheux-Lacroix S; Bujold E
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jul; 42(7):1491-1496. PubMed ID: 36598096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].
Rozenberg P; Deruelle P; Sénat MV; Desbrière R; Winer N; Simon E; Ville Y; Kayem G; Boutron I;
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Apr; 46(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 29625873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Kushtagi P; Garepalli S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 283(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 20145938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study.
Barzilay E; Shay A; Lahav-Ezra H; Shina A; Perlman S; Achiron R; Gilboa Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(14):1885-1888. PubMed ID: 28511577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with lower uterine segment thickness near term in women with previous caesarean section.
Bérubé L; Arial M; Gagnon G; Brassard N; Boutin A; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jun; 33(6):581-7. PubMed ID: 21846447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lower uterine segment scar assessment at 11-14 weeks' gestation to screen for placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior Cesarean delivery.
Bhatia A; Palacio M; Wright AM; Yeo GSH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 34254386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment.
Bujold E; Jastrow N; Simoneau J; Brunet S; Gauthier RJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 201(3):320.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19733288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Swift BE; Shah PS; Farine D
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):830-841. PubMed ID: 30779345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
