These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. Carneiro AV Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy. Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests. Drobatz KJ J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test]. Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios. Bowden SC; Loring DW J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice. Akobeng AK Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests. Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios. Biggerstaff BJ Stat Med; 2000 Mar; 19(5):649-63. PubMed ID: 10700737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnostic accuracy]. Simundić AM Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of diagnostic tests. Fardy JM Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage. Hayen A; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bossuyt P J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):883-91. PubMed ID: 20079607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices]. Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice. Gilchrist JM J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice. Paulo S; Mendes S; Vizinho R; Carneiro AV Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1187-98. PubMed ID: 15587576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]