BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1600 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20502426)

  • 1. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Nezhat FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 19896593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer.
    Yim GW; Kim YT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 24(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22123220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
    Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
    Bandera CA; Magrina JF
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19125000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review.
    Smith AL; Pareja R; Ramirez PT
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 19745798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
    Advincula AP; Song A
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: impact on fellowship training.
    Hoekstra AV; Morgan JM; Lurain JR; Buttin BM; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lowe MP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 19446869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
    Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
    Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
    Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.
    Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 80.