These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20503799)

  • 1. A naturalistic approach to assessing hearing aid candidacy and motivating hearing aid use.
    Walden TC; Walden BE; Summers V; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(10):607-20. PubMed ID: 20503799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living.
    Walden TC; Walden BE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 May; 15(5):342-52. PubMed ID: 15506496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
    Simpson AN; Matthews LJ; Cassarly C; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):468-476. PubMed ID: 30085938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.
    Vaisberg JM; Beaulac S; Glista D; Macpherson EA; Scollie SD
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521989900. PubMed ID: 33563136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of client and clinician views of the importance of factors in client-clinician interaction in hearing aid purchase decisions.
    Poost-Foroosh L; Jennings MB; Cheesman MF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 25751693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiologist Practices: Parent Hearing Aid Education and Support.
    Meibos A; Muñoz K; White K; Preston E; Pitt C; Twohig M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 27115242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids Enable and Empower Self-Management of Hearing Loss: A Qualitative Interview Study Underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel.
    Gomez R; Habib A; Maidment DW; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):921-932. PubMed ID: 34653030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
    Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Qualitative Case Study of Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids: Influences on Patients, Clinicians, and Patient-Clinician Interactions.
    Ng SL; Phelan S; Leonard M; Galster J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jun; 28(6):506-521. PubMed ID: 28590895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smartphone-Based System for Learning and Inferring Hearing Aid Settings.
    Aldaz G; Puria S; Leifer LJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):732-749. PubMed ID: 27718350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Dwyer NY;
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):845-862. PubMed ID: 29373326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.
    Cox RM; Schwartz KS; Noe CM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 20890203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social Connectedness and Perceived Listening Effort in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: A Grounded Theory to Establish Content Validity for a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.
    Hughes SE; Hutchings HA; Rapport FL; McMahon CM; Boisvert I
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):922-934. PubMed ID: 29424766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Follow-Up Clinical Trial Evaluating the Consumer-Decides Service Delivery Model.
    Humes LE; Kinney DL; Main AK; Rogers SE
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 30938563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.