These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20503871)

  • 1. Hydrodynamic sensory stressors produce nonlinear predation patterns.
    Smee DL; Ferner MC; Weissburg MJ
    Ecology; 2010 May; 91(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 20503871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clamming up: environmental forces diminish the perceptive ability of bivalve prey.
    Smee DL; Weissburg MJ
    Ecology; 2006 Jun; 87(6):1587-98. PubMed ID: 16869434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hard clams (Mercenaria mercenaria) evaluate predation risk using chemical signals from predators and injured conspecifics.
    Smee DL; Weissburg MJ
    J Chem Ecol; 2006 Mar; 32(3):605-19. PubMed ID: 16586040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Habitat fragmentation differentially affects trophic levels and alters behavior in a multi-trophic marine system.
    Rielly-Carroll E; Freestone AL
    Oecologia; 2017 Mar; 183(3):899-908. PubMed ID: 28000022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biotic structure indirectly affects associated prey in a predator-specific manner via changes in the sensory environment.
    Wilson ML; Weissburg MJ
    Oecologia; 2013 Feb; 171(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 22821422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Green crab (Carcinus maenas) foraging efficiency reduced by fast flows.
    Robinson EM; Smee DL; Trussell GC
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e21025. PubMed ID: 21687742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alteration of sensory abilities regulates the spatial scale of nonlethal predator effects.
    Smee DL; Ferner MC; Weissburg MJ
    Oecologia; 2008 May; 156(2):399-409. PubMed ID: 18320230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Habitat context influences predator interference interactions and the strength of resource partitioning.
    Hughes AR; Grabowski JH
    Oecologia; 2006 Aug; 149(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 16705438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hydrodynamics affect predator controls through physical and sensory stressors.
    Pruett JL; Weissburg MJ
    Oecologia; 2018 Apr; 186(4):1079-1089. PubMed ID: 29460028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemical encoding of risk perception and predator detection among estuarine invertebrates.
    Poulin RX; Lavoie S; Siegel K; Gaul DA; Weissburg MJ; Kubanek J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(4):662-667. PubMed ID: 29311305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Habitat complexity influences cascading effects of multiple predators.
    Grabowski JH; Hughes AR; Kimbro DL
    Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3413-22. PubMed ID: 19137947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Climate change enhances the negative effects of predation risk on an intermediate consumer.
    Miller LP; Matassa CM; Trussell GC
    Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Dec; 20(12):3834-44. PubMed ID: 24947942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dazed, confused, and then hungry: pesticides alter predator-prey interactions of estuarine organisms.
    Schroeder-Spain K; Smee DL
    Oecologia; 2019 Mar; 189(3):815-828. PubMed ID: 30830264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Turbidity interferes with foraging success of visual but not chemosensory predators.
    Lunt J; Smee DL
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1212. PubMed ID: 26401444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Habitat complexity and benthic predator-prey interactions in Chesapeake Bay.
    Glaspie CN; Seitz RD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205162. PubMed ID: 30289889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Helpful habitant or pernicious passenger: interactions between an infaunal bivalve, an epifaunal hydroid and three potential predators.
    Manning LM; Lindquist N
    Oecologia; 2003 Feb; 134(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 12647150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partitioning mechanisms of predator interference in different habitats.
    Griffen BD; Byers JE
    Oecologia; 2006 Jan; 146(4):608-14. PubMed ID: 16086166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulation of intertidal food webs by avian predators on New England rocky shores.
    Ellis JC; Shulman MJ; Wood M; Witman JD; Lozyniak S
    Ecology; 2007 Apr; 88(4):853-63. PubMed ID: 17536702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulated predator extinctions: predator identity affects survival and recruitment of oysters.
    O'Connor NE; Grabowski JH; Ladwig LM; Bruno JF
    Ecology; 2008 Feb; 89(2):428-38. PubMed ID: 18409432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biogeographic variation in behavioral and morphological responses to predation risk.
    Large SI; Smee DL
    Oecologia; 2013 Apr; 171(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 23001623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.