157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20504364)
1. An eScience-Bayes strategy for analyzing omics data.
Eklund M; Spjuth O; Wikberg JE
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():282. PubMed ID: 20504364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Application of Bayesian Methods in Cancer Prognosis and Prediction.
Chu J; Sun NA; Hu W; Chen X; Yi N; Shen Y
Cancer Genomics Proteomics; 2022; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 34949654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel approach for clustering proteomics data using Bayesian fast Fourier transform.
Bensmail H; Golek J; Moody MM; Semmes JO; Haoudi A
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2210-24. PubMed ID: 15769836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A supervised Bayesian factor model for the identification of multi-omics signatures.
Gygi JP; Konstorum A; Pawar S; Aron E; Kleinstein SH; Guan L
Bioinformatics; 2024 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 38603606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-parametric Bayesian approach to post-translational modification refinement of predictions from tandem mass spectrometry.
Chung C; Emili A; Frey BJ
Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(7):821-9. PubMed ID: 23419374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-model statistical approach for proteomic spectral count quantitation.
Branson OE; Freitas MA
J Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 144():23-32. PubMed ID: 27260494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of integrative clustering methods for the analysis of multi-omics data.
Chauvel C; Novoloaca A; Veyre P; Reynier F; Becker J
Brief Bioinform; 2020 Mar; 21(2):541-552. PubMed ID: 31220206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multimodal joint deconvolution and integrative signature selection in proteomics.
Pan Y; Wang X; Sun J; Liu C; Peng J; Li Q
Commun Biol; 2024 Apr; 7(1):493. PubMed ID: 38658803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Topological integration of RPPA proteomic data with multi-omics data for survival prediction in breast cancer via pathway activity inference.
Kim TR; Jeong HH; Sohn KA
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Jul; 12(Suppl 5):94. PubMed ID: 31296204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging and the completion of the omics paradigm in breast cancer.
Leithner D; Horvat JV; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Thakur S; Wengert G; Morris EA; Helbich TH; Pinker K
Radiologe; 2018 Nov; 58(Suppl 1):7-13. PubMed ID: 29947931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A hierarchical Naïve Bayes Model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays.
Demichelis F; Magni P; Piergiorgi P; Rubin MA; Bellazzi R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():514. PubMed ID: 17125514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data.
Lustgarten JL; Visweswaran S; Gopalakrishnan V; Cooper GF
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 12():309. PubMed ID: 21798039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrative Exploratory Analysis of Two or More Genomic Datasets.
Meng C; Culhane A
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():19-38. PubMed ID: 27008008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian demography 250 years after Bayes.
Bijak J; Bryant J
Popul Stud (Camb); 2016; 70(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 26902889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heterogeneous data integration by tree-augmented naïve Bayes for protein-protein interactions prediction.
Lin X; Chen XW
Proteomics; 2013 Jan; 13(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 23112070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EMT network-based feature selection improves prognosis prediction in lung adenocarcinoma.
Shao B; Bjaanæs MM; Helland Å; Schütte C; Conrad T
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0204186. PubMed ID: 30703089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic network analysis by quasi-bayesian method.
Yuan A; Chen G; Rotimi C
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2009 Feb; 7(1):175-92. PubMed ID: 19226666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An approach to handling and interpretation of ambiguous data in transcriptome and proteome comparisons.
Irmler M; Hartl D; Schmidt T; Schuchhardt J; Lach C; Meyer HE; Hrabé de Angelis M; Klose J; Beckers J
Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1165-9. PubMed ID: 18283664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploration of the omics evidence landscape: adding qualitative labels to predicted protein-protein interactions.
van Noort V; Snel B; Huynen MA
Genome Biol; 2007; 8(9):R197. PubMed ID: 17880677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
