116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20505209)
1. Center-surround visual motion processing in migraine.
Battista J; Badcock DR; McKendrick AM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Nov; 51(11):6070-6. PubMed ID: 20505209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Altered motion perception in migraineurs: evidence for interictal cortical hyperexcitability.
Antal A; Temme J; Nitsche MA; Varga ET; Lang N; Paulus W
Cephalalgia; 2005 Oct; 25(10):788-94. PubMed ID: 16162255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual dysfunction between migraine events.
McKendrick AM; Vingrys AJ; Badcock DR; Heywood JT
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Mar; 42(3):626-33. PubMed ID: 11222520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peri-ictal changes of cortical excitability in children suffering from migraine without aura.
Siniatchkin M; Reich AL; Shepherd AJ; van Baalen A; Siebner HR; Stephani U
Pain; 2009 Dec; 147(1-3):132-40. PubMed ID: 19796876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual noise selectively degrades vision in migraine.
Wagner D; Manahilov V; Loffler G; Gordon GE; Dutton GN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Apr; 51(4):2294-9. PubMed ID: 20019367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orientation discrimination and contrast detection thresholds in migraine for cardinal and oblique angles.
Tibber MS; Guedes A; Shepherd AJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5599-604. PubMed ID: 17122154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocular rivalry in migraine.
Wilkinson F; Karanovic O; Wilson HR
Cephalalgia; 2008 Dec; 28(12):1327-38. PubMed ID: 18798842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local and global motion after-effects are both enhanced in migraine, and the underlying mechanisms differ across cortical areas.
Shepherd AJ
Brain; 2006 Jul; 129(Pt 7):1833-43. PubMed ID: 16684787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vernier acuity is normal in migraine, whereas global form and global motion perception are not.
McKendrick AM; Badcock DR; Gurgone M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):3213-9. PubMed ID: 16799069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motion processing deficits in migraine.
McKendrick AM; Badcock DR
Cephalalgia; 2004 May; 24(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 15096225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodal assessment of optokinetic visual stimulation response in migraine with aura.
Griebe M; Flux F; Wolf ME; Hennerici MG; Szabo K
Headache; 2014 Jan; 54(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 23980899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aging reduces center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing.
Betts LR; Taylor CP; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
Neuron; 2005 Feb; 45(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15694323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcranial direct current stimulation reveals inhibitory deficiency in migraine.
Chadaide Z; Arlt S; Antal A; Nitsche MA; Lang N; Paulus W
Cephalalgia; 2007 Jul; 27(7):833-9. PubMed ID: 17498207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motion processing deficits in migraine are related to contrast sensitivity.
Shepherd AJ; Beaumont HM; Hine TJ
Cephalalgia; 2012 May; 32(7):554-70. PubMed ID: 22529196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ocular motor measures in migraine with and without aura.
Wilkinson F; Karanovic O; Ross EC; Lillakas L; Steinbach MJ
Cephalalgia; 2006 Jun; 26(6):660-71. PubMed ID: 16686904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual evoked potentials in migraine.
Spreafico C; Frigerio R; Santoro P; Ferrarese C; Agostoni E
Neurol Sci; 2004 Oct; 25 Suppl 3():S288-90. PubMed ID: 15549564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Migraine with and without aura: electrophysiological and functional neuroimaging evidence.
Bramanti P; Grugno R; Vitetta A; Di Bella P; Muscarà N; Nappi G
Funct Neurol; 2005; 20(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 15948565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cortical excitability in chronic migraine (transformed migraine) and migraine without aura. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Ozturk V; Cakmur R; Donmez B; Yener GG; Kursad F; Idiman F
J Neurol; 2002 Sep; 249(9):1268-71. PubMed ID: 12242552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feature-based attention influences contextual interactions during motion repulsion.
Tzvetanov T; Womelsdorf T; Niebergall R; Treue S
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3651-8. PubMed ID: 16828839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contextual modulation of the motion aftereffect.
Falkenberg HK; Bex PJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 17469967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
