306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20505513)
1. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Stille LJ
Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ECAP spread of excitation with virtual channels and physical electrodes.
Hughes ML; Stille LJ; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():93-103. PubMed ID: 24095669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Stille LJ
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 18344869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrically evoked compound action potential measures for virtual channels versus physical electrodes.
Hughes ML; Goulson AM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 21187752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of stimulus level on excitation patterns of individual electrode contacts in cochlear implants.
Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; Kalkman RK; Frijns JHM
Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 420():108490. PubMed ID: 35395510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking.
Cohen LT; Richardson LM; Saunders E; Cowan RS
Hear Res; 2003 May; 179(1-2):72-87. PubMed ID: 12742240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients.
Cohen LT; Saunders E; Richardson LM
Int J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 43(6):346-55. PubMed ID: 15457817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.
Spitzer ER; Hughes ML
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):786-798. PubMed ID: 28972468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.
Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds: a comparison of computer versus human analysis methods.
Glassman EK; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 22885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
He S; Shahsavarani BS; McFayden TC; Wang H; Gill KE; Xu L; Chao X; Luo J; Wang R; He N
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Novel Algorithm to Derive Spread of Excitation Based on Deconvolution.
Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 27015548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.
Wu CC; Luo X
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 17(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 26691160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions and HiResolution programming levels in pediatric CII implant subjects.
Eisen MD; Franck KH
Ear Hear; 2004 Dec; 25(6):528-38. PubMed ID: 15604914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants.
Undurraga JA; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):21-36. PubMed ID: 22583921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
