BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1011 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20505947)

  • 1. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
    Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.
    Richardson BS; Czikk MJ; daSilva O; Natale R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 15672028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure.
    Durnwald C; Mercer B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15280110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity to elective repeat cesarean section.
    Eriksen NL; Buttino L
    Am J Perinatol; 1989 Oct; 6(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2789534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
    Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The incidence and impact of increased body mass index on maternal and fetal morbidity in the low-risk primigravid population.
    Sarkar RK; Cooley SM; Donnelly JC; Walsh T; Collins C; Geary MP
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Dec; 20(12):879-83. PubMed ID: 17963180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.
    McMahon MJ; Luther ER; Bowes WA; Olshan AF
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Sep; 335(10):689-95. PubMed ID: 8703167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
    Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies.
    Galyean AM; Lagrew DC; Bush MC; Kurtzman JT
    J Perinatol; 2009 Nov; 29(11):726-30. PubMed ID: 19626026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practice variations between family physicians and obstetricians in the management of low-risk pregnancies.
    Hueston WJ; Applegate JA; Mansfield CJ; King DE; McClaflin RR
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Apr; 40(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 7699347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Twin vaginal birth after cesarean.
    Wax JR; Philput C; Mather J; Steinfeld JD; Ingardia CJ
    Conn Med; 2000 Apr; 64(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 10812766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Severe maternal morbidity and the mode of delivery.
    Pallasmaa N; Ekblad U; Gissler M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(6):662-8. PubMed ID: 18568466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of term breech by intended mode of delivery.
    OboroV O; Dare FO; Ogunniyi SO
    Niger J Med; 2004; 13(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 15293825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-cesarean section puerperal morbidity. The incidence and risk factors at Srinagarind Hospital.
    Pothinam S; Chanpoo T; Lumbiganon P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Mar; 75(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 1506796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neonatal and maternal outcomes in twin gestations > or =32 weeks according to the planned mode of delivery.
    Haest KM; Roumen FJ; Nijhuis JG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Nov; 123(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16260335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean section: does it really prevent the development of postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A prospective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery.
    Groutz A; Rimon E; Peled S; Gold R; Pauzner D; Lessing JB; Gordon D
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 14694448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C; Marozio L; Prandi G; Roccia A; Blefari S; Fabris C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.