These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20506680)

  • 1. Microtubal reanastomosis: success rates as compared to in vitro fertilization.
    Hirth R; Zbella E; Sanchez M; Prieto J
    J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(3-4):161-5. PubMed ID: 20506680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loupe microsurgical tubal sterilization reversal. Experience at a community-level naval hospital.
    Fischer RJ
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):855-9. PubMed ID: 8951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
    Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of assisted hatching in women younger than 38 years undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Hagemann AR; Lanzendorf SE; Jungheim ES; Chang AS; Ratts VS; Odem RR
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19268926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Perinatal results in pregnancies obtained with embryo transfer in vitro fertilization: a case-control study].
    Barros Delgadillo JC; Alvarado Méndez LM; Gorbea Chávez V; Villalobos Acosta S; Sánchez Solís V; Gaviño Gaviño F
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Dec; 74(12):626-39. PubMed ID: 17539318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cumulative live birth rates in cohorts of patients treated with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Witsenburg C; Dieben S; Van der Westerlaken L; Verburg H; Naaktgeboren N
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 16009164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved in vitro fertilization embryo quality and pregnancy rates with intracytoplasmic sperm injection of sperm from fresh testicular biopsy samples vs. frozen biopsy samples.
    Aoki VW; Wilcox AL; Thorp C; Hamilton BD; Carrell DT
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Dec; 82(6):1532-5. PubMed ID: 15589855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF?
    Boeckxstaens A; Devroey P; Collins J; Tournaye H
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2660-4. PubMed ID: 17670765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One last chance for pregnancy: a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above.
    Klipstein S; Regan M; Ryley DA; Goldman MB; Alper MM; Reindollar RH
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 16084887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of female age on the likelihood of a live birth from one in-vitro fertilisation treatment.
    Jansen RP
    Med J Aust; 2003 Mar; 178(6):258-61. PubMed ID: 12633481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ectopic pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: a look at the donor egg population.
    Rosman ER; Keegan DA; Krey L; Liu M; Licciardi F; Grifo JA
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1791-3. PubMed ID: 19524897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived after in vitro oocyte maturation, conventional in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Buckett WM; Chian RC; Dean NL; Sylvestre C; Holzer HE; Tan SL
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):546-50. PubMed ID: 17904128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of 92 ectopic pregnancy patients after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer].
    Xiao HM; Gong F; Mao ZH; Zhang H; Lu GX
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Aug; 31(4):584-7. PubMed ID: 16951524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High pregnancy rate after microsurgical tubal reanastomosis by temporary loose parallel 4-quadrant sutures technique: a long long-term follow-up report on 961 cases.
    Moon HS; Joo BS; Park GS; Moon SE; Kim SG; Koo JS
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1657-62. PubMed ID: 22454457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female obesity impairs in vitro fertilization outcome without affecting embryo quality.
    Bellver J; Ayllón Y; Ferrando M; Melo M; Goyri E; Pellicer A; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 19171335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variations in individual physician success rates within an in vitro fertilization program might be due to patient demographics.
    Lalwani S; Timmreck L; Friedman R; Penzias A; Alper M; Reindollar RH
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Apr; 81(4):944-6. PubMed ID: 15066443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates.
    Lin MH; Kuo-Kuang Lee R; Li SH; Lu CH; Sun FJ; Hwu YM
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Aug; 90(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 17904130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of embryo fragmentation and outcome after fragment removal in in vitro fertilization.
    Keltz MD; Skorupski JC; Bradley K; Stein D
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Aug; 86(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 16824522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing embryo selection with day 5 transfer.
    Reh A; Fino E; Krey L; Berkeley A; Noyes N; Grifo J
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):609-15. PubMed ID: 19368915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preimplantation genetic screening outcomes are associated with culture conditions.
    Beyer CE; Osianlis T; Boekel K; Osborne E; Rombauts L; Catt J; Kralevski V; Aali BS; Gras L
    Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1212-20. PubMed ID: 19181741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.