These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2050714)

  • 1. Quantitative analysis of in vivo tissue responses to titanium-oxide- and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium alloy.
    Hayashi K; Uenoyama K; Matsuguchi N; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Apr; 25(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 2050714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
    Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF; Jarcho M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):225-43. PubMed ID: 2838208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of tissue reaction and osteointegration of metal implants between hydroxyapatite/Ti alloy coat: an animal experimental study.
    Itiravivong P; Promasa A; Laiprasert T; Techapongworachai T; Kuptniratsaikul S; Thanakit V; Heimann RB
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jun; 86 Suppl 2():S422-31. PubMed ID: 12930020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical failure of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy implants. An animal study.
    Nimb L; Gotfredsen K; Steen Jensen J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8116363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.
    Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of metal implants coated with several types of ceramics as biomaterials.
    Hayashi K; Matsuguchi N; Uenoyama K; Kanemaru T; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Nov; 23(11):1247-59. PubMed ID: 2606919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interface mechanics and histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated and porous glass-ceramic implants in canine bone.
    Nimb L; Jensen JS; Gotfredsen K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Dec; 29(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 8600137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions.
    Søballe K; Hansen ES; B-Rasmussen H; Jørgensen PH; Bünger C
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Mar; 10(2):285-99. PubMed ID: 1311039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of the bone reaction to three different titanium alloy and hydroxyapatite coated implants.
    Jansen JA; van der Waerden JP; Wolke JG
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 10171978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new canine model to evaluate the biological response of intramedullary bone to implant materials and surfaces.
    Spivak JM; Ricci JL; Blumenthal NC; Alexander H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Sep; 24(9):1121-49. PubMed ID: 2211742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sphene ceramics for orthopedic coating applications: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Ramaswamy Y; Wu C; Dunstan CR; Hewson B; Eindorf T; Anderson GI; Zreiqat H
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):3192-204. PubMed ID: 19457458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histomorphometric, ultrastructural and microhardness evaluation of the osseointegration of a nanostructured titanium oxide coating by metal-organic chemical vapour deposition: an in vivo study.
    Giavaresi G; Ambrosio L; Battiston GA; Casellato U; Gerbasi R; Finia M; Aldini NN; Martini L; Rimondini L; Giardino R
    Biomaterials; 2004 Nov; 25(25):5583-91. PubMed ID: 15159074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic investigation of the biologic behavior of different hydroxyapatite plasma-sprayed coatings in rabbits.
    Jansen JA; van der Waerden JP; Wolke JG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):603-10. PubMed ID: 8314812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hydroxyapatite-clay bone fixation for loaded implants.
    Maruyama M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Jun; 29(6):683-6. PubMed ID: 7593003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced bone bonding of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants by electrical polarization.
    Kobayashi T; Itoh S; Nakamura S; Nakamura M; Shinomiya K; Yamashita K
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jul; 82(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 17269143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early bone apposition in vivo on plasma-sprayed and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium alloy.
    Wang H; Eliaz N; Xiang Z; Hsu HP; Spector M; Hobbs LW
    Biomaterials; 2006 Aug; 27(23):4192-203. PubMed ID: 16618502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences between the bony interfaces of titanium and hydroxyapatite-alumina plasma-sprayed titanium blade implants.
    Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Akedo H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 2855931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Properties of hydroxyapatite-coated Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by the ion-plating method.
    Yoshinari M; Ozeki K; Sumii T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1991 Nov; 32(4):147-56. PubMed ID: 1668076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of hydroxyapatite-coated and alumina-coated metal implants.
    Inadome T; Hayashi K; Nakashima Y; Tsumura H; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Jan; 29(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7713954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.